High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Restoring Dealership Due to Perversity and Ignoring Material Evidence. The court held that the Arbitrator's finding that termination was unjustified was contrary to the evidence and the terms of the dealership agreement, and the award was perverse under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The case involves a challenge by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Petitioner) against an Arbitral Award dated 25 June 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator. The Respondent, M/s. Vijay Automotive Services, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Eating House Registration for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Lacked Specific Allegations, Rendering Cancellation Order Invalid....

The petitioner, Gurdeepsingh Surjitsingh Chabda, proprietor of Hotel Ding Dong in Aurangabad, challenged the order dated 05/03/2012 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Head Quarters), Auranga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Harassment and Abetment to Suicide Case — Demand for Rs. 5,000 for Electric Motor Not Sufficient to Constitute Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC. Suicide by Consuming Poison Held Not Abetted Under Section 306 IPC as No Instigation or Active Role Proven....

The appellants, Ankush, Raosaheb, and Bhausaheb Gajar, were convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, for offences under Sections 306, 498A, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Evidence of Instigation or Intent. Acquittal Under Section 306 IPC Upheld as Dying Declarations Did Not Show Accused Intended or Acted to Drive Victim to Suicide....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 25th June 1998 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No.143 of 1994, whereby the respondent/accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted Only by Preponderance of Probabilities, Not Mere Denial....

The appellant, Sau. Dwaribai Nanakram Jivatramani, proprietor of Rajesh Agarbatti, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Already Adequate. Market Value of Acquired Land at Rs.120 per sq.m. Was Higher Than Comparable Sale Instances....

The appellant, Jagdish Shriram Poddar, owned agricultural lands bearing survey nos. 22/1 and 22/4, area 1.51 HR, at Mouja Chichala, Wardha. For construction of an overhead railway bridge, 0.20 HR of l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal as Not Maintainable Due to Pecuniary Limit Under Section 102 CPC. Suit for Recovery of Rs. 23,466/- Barred by Amendment Act, 2002 as Value Does Not Exceed Rs. 25,000/-....

The plaintiffs, M/s Marine Crete (India), filed Special Civil Suit No. 65/1981/I for recovery of Rs. 23,466/- with interest. The trial court decreed the suit on 06-08-1999, directing the defendants to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Sales Tax Classification Dispute. Non-prescription sunglasses/goggles are medical devices under Schedule Entry C-107(8) of MVAT Act, 2002, taxable at 4%, not residuary entry E-1 at 12.5%....

The case involves a dispute over the classification of non-prescription sunglasses/goggles under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The respondent-assessee, a registered dealer dealing in spec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, and Copyright Infringement Suit — Sopariwala Exports v. Kuber Khaini Private Limited. The court found deceptive similarity between the plaintiffs' registered trademark 'AFZAL' and defendants' label 'KUBER', and restrained defendants from using the impugned label....

The plaintiffs, Sopariwala Exports (a partnership firm) and another company, are engaged in manufacturing and marketing tobacco under the trademark 'AFZAL' since 1977. They have registered trademarks ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Reviews Interim Injunction Granted in Suit Challenging Redevelopment Resolution of Co-operative Housing Society. Appeals Raise Issues Regarding Membership Rights Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act and Application of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act....

The appeals arose from an interim injunction granted by a single judge of the Bombay High Court on 5 May 2011, restraining the Bombay Catholic Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and the developer M/s.S...