High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Cause of Action at Ratnagiri Confers Jurisdiction on District Court, Not High Court. Filing of Section 11 application before High Court does not confer jurisdiction under Section 42 for Section 34 petition; the court where cause of action arises under Section 2(e) has exclusive jurisdiction....

The petitioner, Premlaxmi And Co., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in the Bombay High Court challenging an arbitral award dated 3rd April 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Prasar Bharati's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Revenue Sharing Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioners, Prasar Bharati (the Broadcasting Corporation of India), challenged an arbitral award dated 17th December 2008 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Cheque Dishonour Case from Aurangabad to Latur Under Section 407 CrPC — Father-Son Dispute Over Compromise Terms. Convenience of Parties and Ends of Justice Justify Transfer Where All Witnesses and Parties Except Respondent Reside in Latur....

The applicant, Subhash Girdharlal Nawandar, filed an application under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking transfer of S.C.C. No. 1487 of 2012 from the court of the 7th Judici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Licence — Limitation Issue Requires Trial. Courts below erred in dismissing suit on limitation without trial on that issue....

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for possession filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondent (defendant). The suit house originally belonged to Mrs. Estafania Pinto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive....

The appellant, Digambar s/o Pandurang Kadu, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Suit — Lease Deed Interpretation and Rent Arrears Calculation. Landlord's Unilateral Adjustment of Security Deposit Held Invalid; Notice of Demand Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act Not Proven....

The appellant, Chandiram Dariyanumal Ahuja, was a tenant of a shop block owned by the respondent, Akola Zilla Shram Wahtuk Sahakari Sanstha, under a lease deed dated 4th February 1986 at a monthly ren...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Due to Limitation — Refusal to Accept Service of Award Constitutes Receipt Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioner, M/s. Zapp India Limited, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 19th August 2009. The award w...