High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Merit. Reference Court's Enhanced Compensation Upheld as Appellants Failed to Show Error in Valuation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894....

The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding where the State of Maharashtra, through the Collector and Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court which enhanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Case — Market Value of Agricultural Land Fixed at Rs.50,000 per Hectare Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land....

The State of Maharashtra filed four first appeals against a common judgment and award dated 29.11.2004 passed by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Cases No.171/2002, 174/2002, 173/2002 and 179/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sale Deed Held as Security Not Absolute Sale. Transaction dated 25.3.1968 was without consideration and executed as security for advance, not an absolute sale....

The case involves a second appeal by the original plaintiff, Shripati Ramchandra Choudhari (since deceased, through his heirs), against the judgment and order dated 25.08.1989 of the District Judge, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Job Work Definition and Value Addition Clause Interpreted. Tribunal's finding that activity amounted to job work and value addition clause does not exclude indigenous material value set aside....

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai filed an appeal under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order dated 6th June, 2006 of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Premsing Jogsing, was convicted by the 3rd Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli for the offence of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. He appealed against the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository in Share Rectification Case — CLB Direction Quashed as Without Jurisdiction. NSDL Cannot Be Directed to Issue Notices Regarding Title Disputes Under Section 111A of Companies Act, 1956....

The case involves an appeal by National Securities Depository Ltd. (NSDL) against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 23 November 2010. The original petitioner, Kamlesh Shah, had filed a com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Extortion Allegations Against Police — No Grounds Made Out for CBI/CID Probe or Departmental Enquiry. The Court held that the petitioner failed to substantiate allegations of illegal arrest and extortion by police officers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, Sanjeev Bishnudev Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction for transfer of investigation of C.R. No.I-22/2012 registered at Navg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination in Sessions Case — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Cross-Examine PW1 Despite Delay. The court set aside the trial court's order rejecting recall of witness under Section 311 CrPC, holding that fair trial requires opportunity to cross-examine, subject to costs....

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Murlidhar Kapile, original accused no.3 in Sessions Case No. 35/2012, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence and Erroneous Multiplier. Deceased pillion rider held contributorily negligent for not wearing helmet; multiplier reduced from 17 to 13 as per Sarla Verma guidelines....

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 7.6.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yavatmal in Claim Petition No.229/2000, whereby the claimants were awarded compensation of Rs.2...