High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Injunction Order in Property Dispute Between Co-Owners. Court upholds trial court's discretion to grant temporary injunction restraining alienation of jointly owned properties pending suit for partition and permanent injunction....

The petitioner, Akhil Mansuklal Mehta, and the respondent, Sheetal Deepak Karamchandani, jointly purchased three properties between 1996 and 1998: (1) property at Shirdi (old survey No. 51/4, new 51/5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Fair Price Shop License Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Cooperative Society's License Cancellation Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Was Not Served and Opportunity of Hearing Was Denied, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955....

The appellant, Girijamata Magasvargiya Mahila Audyogik Sahakari Sanstha Limited, a cooperative society, was granted a fair price shop license under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The District Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder in Unlawful Assembly Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained Under Section 302 read with 149 IPC. Common Object of Assault Proved Despite Acquittal for Robbery Under Section 396 IPC....

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Dhondiram Balu Dhotre, Satish Vithal Dhotre, Ashok Balu Dhotre, and Vitthal Balu Dhotre (original accused Nos.1, 2, 4, and 5) against their conviction a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Objection Raised Before Arbitrator on Appointment or Disclosure, Interest Rate Upheld as Within Contractual Terms....

The petitioner, D.Virendra & Co. & Ors., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 in the Bombay High Court challenging an arbitral award dated 30th June, 2011. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch; Upholds Validity of Requisition Received by Peshkar. Peshkar, as Senior-Most Revenue Officer, Validly Received Notice Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, When Tahsildar on Leave Per Section 10(b) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code....

The petitioner was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Borgaon, Tq. Palam. Respondents Nos. 3 to 8, being members of the seven-member panchayat, submitted a requisition to the Tahsildar for convening a spec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tortfeasor's Death Does Not Entitle Claimants to Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act. The court held that the legal representatives of a deceased tortfeasor cannot claim compensation for his death as the accident was caused by his own rash and negligent driving....

The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd. against a judgment and award dated 29.3.2007 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Bangalore, in MVC.No.2355/2001. The T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer Appeals in Provident Fund Damages Case — Upholds Levy of Damages Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 for Delayed Remittance. Mens Rea Not Essential for Levy of Damages Under Section 14B; Authority Has Discretion to Quantify Damages Based on Circumstances....

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by several companies (M/s J.D. Clothing Company, M/s Gokaldas India, M/s Wear Craft Apparels, and others) against the order of a learned Single Judge di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Apparel Companies Challenging Provident Fund Damages Order. Establishment of separate code number for each unit does not absolve liability under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952....

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by apparel companies (M/s J.D. Clothing Company, M/s Gokaldas India, M/s Wear Craft Apparels, and others) against the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner...