Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Fair Price Shop License Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Cooperative Society's License Cancellation Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Was Not Served and Opportunity of Hearing Was Denied, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Girijamata Magasvargiya Mahila Audyogik Sahakari Sanstha Limited, a cooperative society, was granted a fair price shop license under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The District Supply Officer, Ahmednagar, cancelled the license without issuing any show cause notice or affording an opportunity of hearing to the appellant. The appellant challenged the cancellation by filing Writ Petition No. 155 of 2006 before the Bombay High Court, which was dismissed. Aggrieved, the appellant filed the present Letters Patent Appeal. The core legal issue was whether the cancellation of the license without following principles of natural justice was sustainable. The appellant argued that the cancellation order was passed in gross violation of natural justice as no show cause notice was served and no hearing was given. The respondents contended that the cancellation was justified. The court, after hearing both sides, found that the cancellation order was indeed passed without any show cause notice and without hearing the appellant, which is a clear violation of principles of natural justice. The court set aside the order of the learned Single Judge and the cancellation order, and directed the respondents to restore the license to the appellant pending a fresh decision. The respondents were directed to decide the matter afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellant, within a period of three months from the date of the judgment. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - The cancellation of a fair price shop license without serving a show cause notice and without affording an opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice. The court held that the order of cancellation was passed in gross violation of natural justice and set aside the same, remanding the matter for fresh consideration after giving due opportunity to the appellant. (Paras 1-5)

B) Essential Commodities Act - Fair Price Shop License - Cancellation - Maharashtra Essential Commodities (Licensing, Control and Declaration) Order, 1993 - The appellant, a cooperative society, was granted a fair price shop license. The license was cancelled by the District Supply Officer without issuing a show cause notice or hearing the appellant. The court held that such cancellation is illegal and directed restoration of the license pending fresh decision. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of the appellant's fair price shop license without serving a show cause notice and without affording an opportunity of hearing was valid in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The order of the learned Single Judge and the order of cancellation of the fair price shop license are set aside. The respondents are directed to restore the license to the appellant pending a fresh decision. The respondents shall decide the matter afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellant, within a period of three months from the date of the judgment. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Show cause notice
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Fair price shop license
  • Essential Commodities Act
  • 1955
  • Maharashtra Essential Commodities (Licensing
  • Control and Declaration) Order
  • 1993
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (01) 7

Letters Patent Appeal No. 206 of 2010 in Writ Petition No. 155 of 2006

2013-01-29

A.H. Joshi, Sunil P. Deshmukh

V.D. Hon for Appellant, S.B. Talekar for Respondent No. 1, V.H. Dighe (A.G.P.) for Respondents No. 2 to 4

Girijamata Magasvargiya Mahila Audyogik Sahakari Sanstha Limited

Ravindra S/o Raosaheb Gaikwad @ Deshmukh, The State of Maharashtra, The Deputy Commissioner (Supply) Nashik Division, District Supply Officer, Ahmednagar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of writ petition challenging cancellation of fair price shop license.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the cancellation order and restoration of the license.

Filing Reason

License cancelled without show cause notice or hearing.

Previous Decisions

Writ Petition No. 155 of 2006 was dismissed by the learned Single Judge.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of the fair price shop license without serving a show cause notice and without affording an opportunity of hearing is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the cancellation order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice as no show cause notice was served and no hearing was given. Respondents argued that the cancellation was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

Cancellation of a fair price shop license without issuing a show cause notice and without affording an opportunity of hearing is a gross violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained. The matter must be remanded for fresh consideration after giving due hearing.

Judgment Excerpts

By consent taken up for final hearing. The order of cancellation of the fair price shop license was passed without any show cause notice and without hearing the appellant. The order of cancellation is in gross violation of principles of natural justice. The appeal is allowed. The order of the learned Single Judge and the order of cancellation are set aside. The respondents are directed to restore the license to the appellant pending a fresh decision.

Procedural History

The appellant's fair price shop license was cancelled by the District Supply Officer. The appellant filed Writ Petition No. 155 of 2006 before the Bombay High Court, which was dismissed. The appellant then filed the present Letters Patent Appeal No. 206 of 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Essential Commodities Act, 1955:
  • Maharashtra Essential Commodities (Licensing, Control and Declaration) Order, 1993:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Accommodation in Redevelopment Project Under Section 33(15) of D.C. Rules, 1991. Petitioners, occupants of Tarabai Chawl, entitled to possession in property redeveloped by Sanjivani Developers.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Fair Price Shop License Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Cooperative Society's License Cancellation Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Was Not Served and Opportunity of Hearing Was Denied, V...