Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Vague In-Camera Statements — Failure to Furnish Dates and Places of Incidents Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation. The court held that withholding details of incidents in in-camera statements under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act renders the detention order illegal as it impairs the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution....
The petitioner, Satish Shivcharan Samudre, challenged an order of detention dated 18th May 2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangero...
