High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Attempt to Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. The court found that the chain of circumstances, including motive and last seen evidence, was complete and pointed to the guilt of the appellants under Sections 302 and 307 read with 34 IPC....

The case involves two criminal appeals and a reference arising from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, dated 12 August 1993. The appellants, Pandurang Babu Konkeri, Laxman Babu Kon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Debtor Company for Non-Payment of Decretal Debt. Decretal debt remains due and payable despite unsuccessful attempt to set aside ex-parte decree; no bona fide defence raised....

The petitioner, Gati Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, Atcom Technologies Ltd., for non-payment of a decretal debt. The de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Sarpanch Election for Non-Compliance with Caste Certificate Validation Requirement. Section 10(1A) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 mandates production of acknowledgment of caste certificate submission before nomination deadline; failure invalidates election....

The petitioner, Alka Keshav Tayade, was elected as Sarpanch of Satara Gram Panchayat from a seat reserved for Scheduled Caste category. She had submitted her nomination as a member from the open categ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Substantial Question of Law Must Arise for Interference in Second Appeal; Mere Appreciation of Evidence Not Sufficient....

The appellants, who were defendants 3 and 4 in the original suit O.S.No.39/2003, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 20....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Frame Additional Issues in Suit for Declaration and Possession — Order 14 Rule 5 CPC Requires Issues on All Material Facts Including Adoption and Will...

The petitioner, Sri Armugam, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and recovery of possession in respect of suit property, claiming to be the successor of his sister-in-law Dhanbagyammal. The defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Removal of Adhyaksha of Grama Panchayat; Rule 3(7) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence) Rules, 1994, Prohibits Debate, and Non-Recording of Reasons Does Not Vitiate the Proceedings....

The petitioner, Smt. Gangambike, had been elected as a member of Koppa Grama Panchayat, Piriyapatna Taluk, on 17 May 2010, and subsequently as Adhyaksha on 29 December 2012. On 10 February 2014, fourt...