High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Accused in Bank Fraud Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Conspiracy or Knowledge. Petitioner, a Chartered Accountant, Allegedly Prepared Audit Reports for Loan Applicant but No Material Showed He Knew of Fraudulent Intent....

The petitioner, Manish Dosal Barot, was one of the accused in C.R.No.38 of 2003 registered by the Bank of India, Saki Naka Branch, for offences under sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 474, 420 read with 12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellants, six individuals, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malshiras, for offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 506 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Domain Name Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice. Lack of Proper Notice to Registrant Renders Award Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioner, Telepathy Inc., a US-based company, was the registrant of the domain name 'fls.in' registered on 24 March 2005. Respondent No.5, Flsmidth A/s, filed a complaint under the INDRP Policy ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award on termination and damages but modifies interest rate and clarifies that the builder is entitled to retain constructed area as per agreement....

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award dated 31 October 2011. The petitioners are M/s. Aa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory — Notification Increasing Distance Not Retrospective. The court held that the Commissioner of Sugar was not required to consider factors beyond aerial distance under Clause 6-B of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966....

The petitioner, a sugar factory registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated 2 July 2011 of the Commissioner of Sugar, Maharashtra State, granting an Aerial Distance Certificat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against BBMP for Unauthorized Laying of Sewage Line on Private Property Under Section 230 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. Court Directs Removal of Pipeline and Restoration of Land, Holding That Municipal Authorities Cannot Enter Private Property Without Consent or Acquisition....

The petitioner, Bosch Limited, a company, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore. The petitioner was aggrieved...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal of Licensee in Possession Suit — Licensee Paying License Fee Not a Tenant Under Rent Control Order. Permission of Rent Controller Not Required for Eviction of Licensee Under C.P. & Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949....

The respondent, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, owned premises in Wardha for promotion of Khadi and Village Industry. The appellant represented that he had knowledge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Examines Constitutional Validity of Governmental Appeal Provision in Municipal Matters. Section 184D of Goa Municipalities Act, 1968, Providing Appeal to Government from Appellate Tribunal, Challenged as Unconstitutional....

This batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa involved a challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 184D of the Goa Municipalities Act, 1968. The petitioners, who ...