High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of public order impact....

The petitioner, Krish @ Kano S/O Jitendrabhai Bhuva (Patel), was preventively detained by an order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking Activities to Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 as 'cruel person' set aside as mere registration of FIRs without evidence of public order impact is insufficient....

The petitioner, Rizvanbhai @ Amin @ Kariyo Nurmamadbhai Ghugha, was preventively detained by the District Magistrate, Devbhumi Dwarka, vide order dated 05.01.2026, as a 'cruel person' under Section 2(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(e) of PITNDPS Act, 1988 set aside as mere involvement in illicit traffic without affecting public order does not justify preventive detention....

The petitioner, Kazimali @ Wasim Yunusali @ Saiyedsaab Saiyed, filed a petition through his brother-in-law challenging a preventive detention order dated 17.01.2026 passed by the Director General of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of public order impact....

The petitioner, Abdulkadir Ibrahim Sabu, was preventively detained by an order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the District Magistrate, Chhota Udepur, classifying him as a 'cruel person' under Section 2(bb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses GSRTC Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Cross-Objection in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Upheld, Compensation Enhanced. Deceased was a compounder earning Rs.6,500 per month; multiplier of 18 applied with 40% future prospects and Rs.70,000 under conventional heads....

The Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (GSRTC) appealed against the judgment and award dated 20.06.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary), Ahmedabad (Rural) at Mirzapur in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order....

The petitioner, Abdulbhai Alias Barko Jusabbhai Shama, was preventively detained by an order dated 05.01.2026 passed by the District Magistrate, Devbhoomi Dwarka, classifying him as a 'cruel person' u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-Supply of Relied-Upon Documents in Section 148A Proceedings Renders Reassessment Order Invalid....

The petitioner, Shah Nanchandbhai Ranchhoddas Choksi, a partnership firm, challenged a notice dated 30.06.2025 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the order dated 30.06.2025 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Reinstates Daily Wager with Continuity and 50% Back Wages. Termination of a daily wager without following Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and denial of back wages without valid reasons is unsustainable....

The appellant, Gaurang Krushnakumar Pathak, was employed as a daily wager with the respondent authorities. His services were terminated without following the procedure under Section 25F of the Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Income Reassessed Based on Minimum Wages. Claimant's Income Enhanced from Rs.4,500 to Rs.7,450 per Month Following Govind Yadav Precedent....

The appellant, Kamlesh Vajesinh Meda, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 10.11.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribun...