High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Incomplete Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Sections 302, 498A, 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Subhash Mukund Kamble, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, for offences under Sections 498A, 302, and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his wife, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close friend of deceased and his testimony suffered from material contradictions and improvements....

The appellant, Pervinderjeet @ Gogi Dhanuva, was convicted by the 9th Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.289 of 2005 for the murder of Vishal Sharma under Section 302 IPC an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as oral dying declaration to brother and recovery of blood-stained knife and clothes established guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Sandeep Suresh Gurav @ Khatmal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Raju Gangaram Bhale under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life impriso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Receiver's Order in Suit No. 224 of 1961 — Held That Receiver Cannot Evict Tenant Without Court's Permission Under Order XL Rule 1 CPC. The court set aside the receiver's eviction order as without jurisdiction, emphasizing that a receiver is an officer of the court and must act under court's directions....

The applicant, Shekhar Narayan Shetty, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated 5 May 2015 passed by the Court Receiver, Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Want of Authority in Defamation Action by Company. Plaintiff No.2 lacked valid board resolution with mandatory consent of V-C Investor under Articles of Association to institute suit on behalf of Plaintiff No.1....

The suit was a defamation action filed by Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. (Plaintiff No.1) and its Managing Director (Plaintiff No.2) against Azim Premji (Defendant) alleging defamatory statements mad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision in Favor of Film Production Company on Directors' Remuneration and Industrial Undertaking Status. The Court held that the disallowance under Section 40(c) was rightly deleted and that film production qualifies as an industrial undertaking under Section 80J of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

The case pertains to the assessment year 1981-82. The assessee, M/s. Rupam Pictures Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the business of film production. During the relevant year, two directors, Shri Hrishikesh ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Preparation Case Due to Uncorroborated Police Testimony. Conviction under Sections 399, 402 IPC and Section 135 Bombay Police Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Preparation for Dacoity Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellants, Suresh Ramaswamy Iyer, Salim Abdul Kadar, and Ajaykumar Anil Shrivastav, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.586 of 2000 for offences p...