High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Recovery of Money. The court held that only plaint averments are relevant for Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and the plaint clearly disclosed a cause of action for recovery of balance amount....

The petitioner, M/s Cyrus Marine Services, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 02.11.2015 passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vasco, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Recovery Suit — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The court held that the plaint contained specific averments regarding the contract, bills, and outstanding amount, thus disclosing a cause of action....

The petitioner, M/s Cyrus Marine Services, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 02.11.2015 passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vasco, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute Over Common Plot — Confirms Concurrent Findings of Fact and Dismisses Appeals with Costs....

The case involves a property dispute between the appellant, Ramchandra Govindrao Kottawar, and the respondents, Mrs. Dorpadabai Appasaheb Dodmani and others, over a common plot with construction locat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeals in Property Dispute — Confirms Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts on Title and Possession. Registered Sale Deed Claim Fails as Respondents' Suit for Specific Performance Decreed and Appellant's Suit for Possession Dismissed....

The case involves a property dispute between the appellant, Ramchandra Govindrao Kottawar, and the respondents, Mrs. Dorpadabai Appasaheb Dodmani and others, over a common plot with construction admea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pension Claim of Former Government Employees Absorbed in VSNL. Pensionary benefits under Office Memorandum dated 5 July 1989 not applicable to employees who opted for absorption in VSNL and received benefits under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme....

The petitioners, former employees of the Department of Overseas Communication Services (OCS) of the Government of India, were absorbed into Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (VSNL), now Tata Communications...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Anganwadi Sevika Appointment Dispute. Private Institution Experience Certificate Not Valid Under Government Resolutions for Awarding Experience Marks....

The petitioner, Chhaya Vasantrao Shinde, challenged the judgment and order dated 07.01.2015 of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad (Respondent No.2), which had allowed the appeal of Respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Revision Application Under Mamlatdar's Court Act Due to Bona Fide Mistake of Lawyer. Petitioner's Delay in Filing Revision Before Additional Collector Condoned as Lawyer's Erroneous Advice Constitutes Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act....

The petitioner, Mohan Khemlo Bandekar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16/10/2014 passed by the Additional Collector-II, North Goa, rejecting his application for condonation of delay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Revision Application Under Mamlatdar's Court Act Due to Bona fide Mistake of Lawyer. Petitioner's delay in filing revision before Additional Collector instead of Deputy Collector condoned as sufficient cause under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963....

The petitioner, Mohan Khemlo Bandekar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Goa, challenging an order dated 16/10/2014 passed by the Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Trust Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Direction to Implead Trustee in Appeal Before Charity Commissioner Upheld as Petitioner Was Already Represented by Trust....

The judgment concerns a review petition filed by Ganesh N. Salunkhe against an order dated 4 February 2015 passed in Writ Petition No. 174 of 2015. The writ petition was instituted by Nizampur Vibhag ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Trust Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Direction to Implead Trustee in Appeal Before Charity Commissioner Was Made with Consent and Is Not Contrary to Order XLI Rule 20 CPC....

The review petitioner, Ganesh N. Salunkhe, sought review of an order dated 4 February 2015 passed in Writ Petition No. 174 of 2015. The order directed that the review petitioner be impleaded as a resp...