High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Daily Wage Workers by Municipal Council. Held that termination without notice and without following Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution....

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by daily wage workers employed by the Municipal Council, Bhusawal. The petitioners were engaged as daily wage workers for various periods, some fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Deposit Condition in Commercial Suit — Upholds Order Requiring Defendant to Deposit Rs.1.5 Crore for Reconsideration of Earlier Condition. Court Held That Imposition of Deposit Condition Was Not Arbitrary and Defendant Failed to Show Any Change in Circumstances....

The appellant, Sunil B. Bhosale, was the original defendant in Suit No.4351 of 1996 filed by the respondent, Kamal Organic Chemicals, a division of Kirti Manor Properties and Hotels Private Limited. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cooperative Loan Recovery Case — Guarantor's Liability Upheld Despite Borrower's Death. Notice of hearing under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 restored as guarantor's liability is co-extensive and continues after death of principal debtor....

The petitioner, Sunil Sitaram Mahajan, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20.01.2015 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur. By tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order in Cooperative Loan Recovery — Guarantor's Liability Upheld Despite Non-Impleadment of Borrower. Section 101 Certificate Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Cannot Be Set Aside in Revision Without Proper Notice to All Parties....

The petitioner, Sunil Sitaram Mahajan, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.01.2015 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kolhapur Division. The impugned orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Capital Gains Tax Case — Transfer of Shares of Foreign Company Not Taxable in India. Shares of a Bermuda company transferred outside India do not constitute transfer of a capital asset situated in India under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

The petitioner, Techpac Holdings Ltd., a company incorporated in Bermuda, challenged an assessment order dated 25th March 2013 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD-II), Mumbai, for Ass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Capital Gains Tax Case — Transfer of Shares by Non-Resident Not Taxable as No Capital Asset in India. Shares of a foreign company held not to be a capital asset situated in India under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and transfer not taxable under Section 9(1)(i) as income deemed to accrue or arise in India....

The Petitioner, Techpac Holdings Ltd., a company incorporated in Bermuda and a non-resident, challenged an Assessment Order dated 25th March 2013 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD-I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to LPG Distributor Selection Guidelines and Advertisement. Guidelines Providing for Objective Criteria Including Land Ownership and Financial Capacity Upheld as Valid....

The petitioners, Suresh Pralhad Pawar and Balasaheb Mahadeo Kshirsagar, filed writ petitions challenging the advertisement dated 27th July 2011 issued by the respondent oil companies for selection of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Continuous Hostile Possession for Over 12 Years Under Section 100 CPC....

The present appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a suit for permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by respondents) agai...