High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Contradict Each Other and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Prosecution Case....

The appellant, Smt. Nirmala w/o Vinayakrao Sonare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati for the murder of her daughter-in-law, Pranita Moreshwar Sonare, under Section 302 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Panchayat Member's Participation in Meeting Granting Occupancy Certificate to Father. No Pecuniary Interest Established Under Section 10(1)(j) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 as Mere Relationship or Business Interest Does Not Constitute Disqualification....

The petitioner, Narayan Datta Naik, filed a writ petition challenging the participation of respondent no.2, Derick Peter Jose Maria Vales, a member of the Village Panchayat of Sancoale, in meetings wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Cause of Action and Abuse of Process. Plaintiff failed to identify any protectable work or substantial similarity with defendant's film, leading to dismissal with costs....

The plaintiff, Akashaditya Harishchandra Lama, filed a suit for copyright infringement seeking an interim injunction to restrain the release of the film 'Mohenjo Daro' directed by Ashutosh Gowarikar a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petition Filed Beyond Three-Month Limitation Period Plus 30-Day Condonation Window Without Sufficient Cause....

The petitioner, Logic Eastern India Private Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dated 7th December 2012 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Terminate Arbitrator's Mandate for Alleged Undue Delay in Arbitration Proceedings. Section 14(2) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires de jure inability to act, not mere delay, for termination of mandate....

The petitioners, Ramavtar B. Jajodia and Santosh Ramavtar Jajodia, filed a petition under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking termination of the mandate of the sole ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ESIC's Challenge to Exemption Notification Due to Unexplained Delay and Laches. The Court held that the ESI Court's order granting partial relief to the establishment had attained finality and the writ petition challenging the exemption notification after six years was not maintainable....

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a notification dated 23 October 2007 issued by the State of Maharashtra granting exempt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ESIC's Petition Challenging Exemption Notification Due to Unexplained Delay and Laches. The court held that the ESI Corporation cannot challenge a notification granting exemption under Section 87 of the ESI Act after nearly seven years, especially when the ESI Court order based on that notification was not appealed....

The Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 23 October 2007 issued by the State of Maharashtra granting exempti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature of Bombay Quashes Industrial Court's Order Granting Backwages in Forgery Case Under MRTU and PULP Act. Forgery Held Not Minor or Technical Misconduct; Employer Entitled to Withdraw Deposited Amount....

The case arose from a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 filed by an employee of a cooperative bank challenging his dismiss...