High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Magistrate to Decide SARFAESI Section 14 Application in Light of Amended Section 17(4A) - Tenancy Claims to be Decided by DRT. Writ Petition Disposed with Direction to Consider Amendment w.e.f. 1.9.2016....

The petitioner, Vijaya Bank, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the inaction of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai, in deciding Misc. Application No. CC N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Alternative Remedy Under SARFAESI Act Available to Third Party. Third person aggrieved by measures under Sections 13(4) and 14 of SARFAESI Act can approach Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17....

The petitioner, Sunil Jaidev Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 27 September 2016 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reversal of Labour Court's Part-I Judgment on Enquiry Fairness. Enquiry Officer Cannot Be Examined as Witness by Management to Prove Fairness of Domestic Enquiry....

The petitioner, Baba Pandit Ghodake, challenged his termination dated 13/12/2010 w.e.f. 15/12/2010 by the respondent society, Pargaon Sudrik Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd., by filing Comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheating Case Based on Matrimonial Fraud Allegation — Failure to Prove Dishonest Intention at Inception. Suppression of marital status and receipt of advance for marriage expenses does not constitute cheating under Section 420 IPC without evidence of initial fraudulent intent....

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by H. Manjunatha @ Manjunatha Prasad @ Shivakumar @ Mahesh @ Prakash against the State of Karnataka. The petitioner was convicted by the Additional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Co-operative Society Tax Exemption Case — Profits Paid to Members Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(d) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that a co-operative society assessed as a 'person' under Section 2(31) is entitled to claim deduction on profits paid to its members under Section 80P(2)(d)....

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench, which had allowed the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts. Creditor's Statutory Demand for USD 3 Million Remained Unpaid, Leading to Order for Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956....

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439(1)(b) of the Compani...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charges Against Journalists in Sting Operation Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Journalists posing as representatives of a company to expose corruption in public life does not constitute an offence under Section 12 of the PC Act or Sections 120-B, 114, 419 read with 34 IPC....

The petitioners, Mahendra Mishra (Director of TV-9 Karnataka), L.R. Shrehas, and Shwetha Prabhu (news reporters), were arraigned as accused in Spl.C.C. No.249/2015 before the XXIII Additional City Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434....

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439(1)(b) of the Comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the company was commercially insolvent and unable to pay its debts, and appointed the Official Liquidator to take charge of its assets....

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439(1)(b) of the Compani...