High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Personation and Cheating Case — Identification of Accused Not Established. Failure to conduct Test Identification Parade and complainant's inability to identify accused in court led to acquittal under Sections 170 and 420 IPC....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 15th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai in Criminal Case No. 226/P/2001 dated 26th September 2003, whereby the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 31.10.2001 passed by the Special Judge, Thane, in Special Case No.6 of 1992, acquitting the respondents Pradeep Vishwasrao Jadhav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Absence of Theft and Common Object. Removal of Tin Sheets from Grampanchayat Property Does Not Constitute Dacoity Under Section 395 IPC as Essential Ingredients of Theft and Dishonest Intention Are Missing....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 12th October 2001 passed by the Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.89 of 2001, acquitting the respondents (original accu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Instigation Under Section 306 IPC....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the IInd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, at Alibag in Sessions Case No. 35 of 2002, which acquitted the respondents, Ramesh Damodar M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Interest Case. Reference Court's Order Granting 15% Interest from Date of Application Upheld Under Section 34 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Judgment and Order dated 26th February 1992 passed by the Reference Court of Joint District Judge at Nashik, which corrected its earlier Award dated 11th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhanced Interest Upheld. Reference Court's Order Granting 15% Interest from Date of Application for Additional Benefits Under Amended Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Affirmed....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 7th February 1992, which granted interest at 15% per annum from the date of filing of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal Against Enhanced Interest in Land Acquisition Case. Reference Court Cannot Modify Award After Signing as It Becomes Functus Officio....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a judgment and order dated 21st February 1992 passed by the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) in Land Reference No.157 of 1982. The Reference Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Interest Rate of 15% p.a. Upheld Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as Amended in 1984. Court holds that amendment granting higher interest applies to pending references and awards passed after the amendment date....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 26th February 1992 passed by the Joint District Judge, Nashik, in Land Reference No.158 of 1984. The Reference Court had enhanced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case. Reference Court's Order Granting 15% Interest from Date of Application Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Judgment and Order dated 24th February 1992 passed by the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) in Land Reference No.16 of 1984. The Reference Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Upholds Additional Benefits to Claimant. The Court held that the Reference Court had jurisdiction to grant additional benefits under the Amending Act 68 of 1984 as the reference was pending on the date of amendment....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 29th January 1992, which granted additional benefits to the claimant-respondent under th...