High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Wife in Husband's Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Nandhini, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukottai, in SC No.18/2022 dated 26.10.2022 for the murder of her husband under Section 302 IPC and for causing d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Wife in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Nandhini, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukottai, for the murder of her husband under Section 302 IPC and for causing disappearance of evidence under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Sections 74 and 75(1) of Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 and Common Cadre Service Rules for Cooperative Societies. The Court held that the impugned provisions and rules are constitutionally valid and do not violate Article 19(1)(c) or Article 43B of the Constitution....

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 74 and 75(1) of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985...

The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and the corresponding State GST Rules of Tamil Nadu an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Writ Petition on Denial of Nativity Certificate to Disabled Candidate for Public Employment. The Case Involves Interpretation of G.O.Ms.No.48 on Nativity by Birth and Application of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 for Reasonable Accommodation....

The petitioner, a person with 40% locomotor disability, was born in Puducherry on 04.10.1992 and completed his education there, including a B.Tech from Pondicherry Engineering College. He was provisio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Disability Pension to Retired Army Personnel in Hypertension Case — Attributability to Military Service Established. Court sets aside Armed Forces Tribunal order, holds that hypertension is a stress-related disease attributable to military service under Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961....

The petitioner, a retired Indian Army personnel, served for 34 years, 5 months, and 4 days before retiring on 31.5.2021. Prior to retirement, a Release Medical Board on 28.5.2021 assessed his disabili...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses TANGEDCO Appeals in Electricity Refund Dispute — Remand Order Upheld for Fresh Consideration of Refund Claim. Writ Court's Remand for Consideration of Representation on Merits Not Interfered With....

The present intra-Court Appeals were instituted by the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) challenging a common writ order dated 31.01.2022 in W.P.Nos.29944 & 29947 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses TANGEDCO Appeals in Electricity Refund Case. Remand Order Upheld as No Interference Warranted Where Board Directed to Consider Representation Afresh....

The present intra-court appeals were instituted by the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) challenging a common writ order dated 31.01.2022 in W.P.Nos.29944 & 29947 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision in Partition Suit — Appointment of Advocate Commissioner for Identification of Property Not Permissible Under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC. Court holds that Commissioner cannot be appointed to collect evidence for a party; application filed after commencement of trial was rightly rejected....

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the plaintiffs (Devaraj and Shankar) against the order dated August 16, 2022, passed by the trial court in I.A.No.225 of 2018 in O.S.No.172 of 2018...