High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Benefit of Doubt and Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Dowry Death Allegation Under Sections 498A, 302, 201 IPC....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the learned Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No. 90 of 2000, whereby both the accused (respondents) were acquitted for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt....

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Sessions Court convicting Shankar Sonu More and Ravindra Kashinath More (original accused No.1 and No.3) under Section 302 read wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Adjudicates Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree in Cruelty Case Under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Relying on Single Incident and Unproven Allegations to Dissolve Marriage....

The case concerns a Family Court Appeal filed by the wife against a divorce decree granted in favor of the husband on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Refusal to Quash FIR Against Advocate in Cheating Case Due to Fraudulent Land Deals. Allegations of Using Forged Notarized Documents of Deceased Persons for Cheating Not Protected by Section 13 of Notaries Act, 1952....

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 420 of 2017 registered at Bhoka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision in KVAT Penalty Case — Minor Discrepancy Between e-Sugam and Invoice Not Sufficient for Penalty. The Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside penalty under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, accepting the assessee's explanation that the discrepancy was due to pre-final invoice feeding....

The State of Karnataka filed a revision petition under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against the order of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, in STA No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Assault Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 353 and 307 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove appellant's presence at the scene beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Thomas, was accused No.2 in a case arising from an incident on 18.07.2006 where a group of persons allegedly assaulted forest officials, including the complainant Ravikumar, a Forest Wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 325 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Naga, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-IV, Mysore, for the offence punishable under Section 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentenced to simple im...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Gutkha Excise Duty Case for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the CESTAT's findings on valuation and penalty were factual and not perverse, and no question of law arose under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944....

The case involves appeals filed by M/s. Trishul Arecanut Granuels Private Limited and its Director, H.S. Nataraj, against the Commissioner of Central Tax, under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape FIR Against Applicant in Consensual Relationship Case — Both Parties Were Married at Relevant Time, No False Promise of Marriage....

The applicant, Sachin Shantaram Potude, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashment of FIR No. 273/2013 registered at Police Station, Ward...