High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 376/511 and 506 IPC and SC/ST Act – Appeal Filed Against Conviction Citing Delay in FIR and Inconsistent Evidence...

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, by Hiralal Kasam Shaikh, challenging his conviction by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Teacher in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Allegation of Aggravated Sexual Assault Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other on Material Facts Under Section 10 read with Section 9(f) of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012....

The appellant, Pandurang Narayan Jadhav, a Sanskrit teacher at Onkar Vidyalaya, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 368 of 2013 for the offence punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitions Declaring Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition for Karwar Port Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession....

The petitioners, fishermen residing in Goudawada, Baitkhol, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the land acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes of Writ Petition Concerning Stop-Work Notice for Construction Project. Dispute Centered on Measurement of Land and Prior Court Order Permitting Construction at Developer's Own Risk....

The litigation concerns a construction project undertaken by M/s.Shantai Group, a builder-developer partnership firm, in Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune. The dispute involves the State of Maharashtra, revenue ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Setting Aside Cancellation of Promotion and Withdrawal of ACP Benefits. Employer's Action of Cancelling Promotion Without Hearing Employee Held to be Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971....

The petitioners, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran and another, challenged the order dated 12/10/2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane, which allowed the complaint of unfair labour practice filed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBDT Action Plan Points System for Tax Recovery as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. The court struck down the system of awarding points to Income Tax Officers for achieving tax recovery targets, holding it ultra vires the Income Tax Act, 1961 and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution....

The Bombay High Court, in a judgment dated 11th April 2019, dealt with two petitions challenging a portion of the Central Action Plan for the financial year 2018-2019 prepared by the Central Board of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Sale Deed Cancellation Suit — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Concurrent findings of fact that sale deed was executed voluntarily and for consideration cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC....

The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court dismissing their suit for cancellation of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.4 in UAP Act Case on Grounds of Parity and Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Petitioner-accused No.4, not named in FIR, granted bail as co-accused already released and no material showing his involvement in conspiracy under Sections 13, 16, 18, 20, 38 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967....

The petitioner, Riyaz Ahamed Sayeedi, accused No.4, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Spl.CC.No.330/2015 arising out of Crime No.11/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Remand Order in Private Complaint Case. The court held that once cognizance is taken and process issued under Section 204 CrPC, the Magistrate cannot be directed to conduct a re-enquiry under Section 202 CrPC....

The petitioner, Mrs. Jessie Mary Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 07.06.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, wh...