High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Under Sections 302, 307 IPC. The appeals challenged the conviction based on alleged omissions and contradictions in injured eyewitness testimony and questioned the role of appellants in an unlawful assembly under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860....

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nasik dated 21 July 2016 in Sessions Case No.90 of 2013, convicting the appellants under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302, 307 read with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Reviews Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code. Appeal Challenges Trial Court's Finding of Murder by Throwing Deceased into Common Well, Raising Questions of Common Intention, Interested Witnesses, and Accidental Fall....

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of conviction dated 10.11.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Reviews Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Where Accused Was Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Murder by Burning. Conviction Rested on Two Dying Declarations Recorded on the Same Day, and the Appeal Challenged Their Reliability and the Acquittal of Co-accused....

The criminal appeal arises from a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where the appellant, original accused No.2, was sentenced to life imprisonment by the Additional Sessions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Recovery Proceedings Against Retired Tahsildar Under Employees' Compensation Act and Revenue Recovery Act — Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Recovery Communications. Labour Court Award Against Former Tahsildar Held Enforceable as Arrears of Land Revenue Unless Challenged Under Section 30 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923....

These two writ petitions arose from a claim for compensation under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 following a motor accident. The petitioner, a retired Tahsildar, was posted at Shindkheda in Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Upholds Order Superseding Agricultural Produce Market Committee Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Supersession Under Section 45(1) Upheld Based on Admissions of Sale Below MSP and Unauthorized Action by Secretary Despite Challenge to Decision-Making Process....

The matter arose from a writ petition filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging an order dated 26.07.2021 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Kidnapping and Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicts Medical Evidence and Prosecution Witnesses....

The appellant, Haji Kareem, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge at Kalaburagi in Special Case (POCSO) No.5/2014 for offences under Sections 366, 372(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appropriate Authority's Purchase Order Under Section 269UD(1) Income Tax Act for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Supply Valuation Report and Sale Instances to Transferor and Transferee Before Passing Compulsory Purchase Order Invalidated Proceedings....

The writ petition challenged an order dated 28 April 1993 passed by the Appropriate Authority under Section 269UD(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing compulsory purchase by the Central Governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Refusing Discharge in Murder Case for Lack of Prima Facie Material. Call Detail Records and Belated Contradictory Witness Statement Held Insufficient to Frame Charge Under Sections 302, 201, 212 of Indian Penal Code, 1860....

The case arose out of a criminal revision application filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging an order dated 24 April 2019 by which the Additional Sessions Judge, ...