High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Ramesh Waman Bodke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.271/2012 for the murder of his cousin Samadhan Motiram Bodke, along with co-accused Pandar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by USV Pvt Ltd in Disparagement Cases, Upholds Injunction Against Comparative Advertising. The court held that disparaging a rival's product by implying it contains harmful ingredients without scientific basis constitutes unfair trade practice under Section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986....

The case involves two appeals filed by USV Private Limited (USVPL) against a common order dated 16th June 2022 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in two commercial IP suits. The respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Tribunal Order Quashing Reservation Promotion Rule. Rule 3 of Maharashtra Public Services (Reservation) Rules, 2017 Held Ultra Vires for Non-Compliance with Article 16(4A) Conditions....

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, and the Director, Higher Education, filed two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 3rd May 2018 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Substitution of Legal Representatives in Writ Petition Despite Objection from Purchaser Defendant. Order 22 Rule 3 CPC applies to writ proceedings under Article 227, and substitution is a procedural right that cannot be denied merely because the petitioner died during pendency....

The petitioner, Mallappa @ Malleshappa Fakkirappa Goudappanavar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 09.09.2014 passed by the III A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, Section 506 IPC, and Section 4 of the Protection of Child...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Nivrutti Ninaji Ghule, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of his niece-in-law, Sharda, under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support penetration....

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 4 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness turned hostile and circumstantial evidence failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Nivrutti Ninaji Ghule, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of his niece-in-law, Sharda, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Leave Encashment Withheld by Employer After Superannuation. Withholding of leave encashment on ground of pending departmental inquiry is impermissible as leave encashment is a vested right and not a gratuity or pension....

The petitioner, Pradip Kumar Roy, was appointed as a Junior Executive Trainee in CMPDI, Ranchi on 01/07/1981 and later transferred to the respondent-Company, Western Coalfields Ltd., on 06/03/2003. He...