High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Discrepancies in Evidence. The court upheld the dismissal of the suit for specific performance as the plaintiff failed to prove the execution of the agreement to sell and did not show readiness and willingness to perform the contract....

The present First Appeal is filed by the heirs of the original Plaintiff challenging the Judgment dated 19th December 2007 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, whereby the suit for specific performa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11....

The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai Patel and Another) and the respondents (Atharva Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Suit for Injunction and Declaration — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Article 227. Petitioners failed to establish exclusive ownership over suit property; findings of trial court and first appellate court upheld as per Section 100 CPC....

The petitioners, Ganesh D Tapkir and Santosh Krushna Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and decree dated 30th November 2024 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of GST Registration and Rejection of Revocation Due to Arbitrary Mechanical Order; Orders Restoration. Cancellation Under Section 29 of CGST Act Without Consideration of Assessee's Submissions and Vague Show Cause Notice Held Invalid....

The petitioner, a proprietary concern engaged in aggregation and supply of used plastic PET bottles, held GST registration effective from 16 March 2023. In March 2024, its proprietor Mr. Ghosebasha wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dishonest Inducement. Conviction under Section 420 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove fraudulent intention from the inception....

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by Selvi, the sole petitioner, against her conviction under Section 420 IPC for cheating. The prosecution alleged that Selvi, along with co-accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Case Due to Contributory Negligence — Deceased Motorcyclist Found 50% Liable for Collision with Tipper Lorry. The court apportioned liability equally after finding the deceased was riding on the wrong side of the road....

The appeal was filed by the insurance company challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.1387 of 2023. The deceased, Palani Kumar, a 48-year-o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Preliminary Decree for Partition in Favour of Daughter in Hindu Succession Act Case. Court holds that Will executed after testator's death is invalid and settlement deed after pre-suit notice is not binding....

The case involves a partition suit filed by M. Kowsalyadevi (plaintiff) against her father (second defendant) and other family members, seeking a 1/8th share in two items of property. The first item w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance, Upholds Counterclaim for Possession. Plaintiffs failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform sale agreement within reasonable time under Specific Relief Act, 1963....

The appellants, B.Kannan and K.Tamijarassy, were the plaintiffs in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 12.07.2006, filed against the respondent, J.Margaret Alice, who was the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Specific Performance Execution, Setting Aside Executing Court's Order Allowing Third-Party Claim Under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC. Application Under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC Held Not Maintainable in Execution for Possession Without Attachment, and Successive Application Barred by Res Judicata....

The appellant, V.M.Tamilselvan, was the plaintiff-decree holder in a suit for specific performance (O.S.No.622 of 2010) based on an agreement of sale dated 21.11.2007 against the 2nd respondent, M.S.B...