High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Reviews Challenge to Land Acquisition Award. Court Scrutinizes Procedural Compliance with Sections 6-9 and 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894....

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging the award dated 02.12.2015 passed by the Special Lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reviews Civil Revision Application Against Order Rejecting Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The Applicant Contended that Pre-emption Suit was Barred by Six-Month Limitation under Articles 1566 and 2309 of Civil Code, 1867....

The matter arose from a Civil Revision Application filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa by the original defendant no.1 challenging the order dated 08.02.2012 passed by the learned Trial Court,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Whether Fresh Eviction Suit Is Barred by Earlier Consent Decree Under Section 47 CPC. Trial Court's Decision That Bar of Suit Is Mixed Question of Fact and Law Is Challenged in Civil Revision Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC....

The present civil revision application arose from an order dated 18.11.2017 passed by the trial court in Regular Civil Suit No. 46/2016, dismissing the defendants' application under Order 7 Rule 11(d)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reversal of Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute Between Brothers. Compromise Decree for Partition Gives Defendant Right to Construct on His Share, Plaintiff Fails to Show Exclusive Possession....

The dispute arose between two brothers, Udayraj Babaso Patil (petitioner/defendant) and Pramod Babaso Patil (respondent/plaintiff), over a suit property admeasuring 0.25.38 R of Gat No.2273 situated a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging De-registration of Cooperative Society by Minister for Cooperation. Minister Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act by Deciding on Building Legality Issues Beyond the Act's Scope....

The petitioner, Airoli Neha Apartment Co-op. Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 13 August 2019 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Proximity of Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand and death by strangulation was not established beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellants, Lalasaheb Bansode, Sagarbai Bansode, and Pradip Bansode, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, for the murder of Kalpana, the wife of Pradip, under Section 302 r/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stay of Execution Proceedings in Possession Suit — Order 21 Rule 29 CPC Cannot Be Invoked After Decree Is Passed. Execution Court Erred in Staying Execution Based on Subsequent Suit Filed by Judgment Debtor After Decree....

The petitioners (decree holders) obtained a decree for possession in O.S. No. 79/2003 (originally O.S. No. 3/1971) against the respondent (judgment debtor). The decree was confirmed up to the High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stay of Execution Proceedings in Possession Suit — Order 21 Rule 29 CPC Not Applicable When Subsequent Suit Relates to Different Property. Decree Holders' Right to Possession Upheld as Judgment Debtor's Application for Stay Was Based on a Suit Involving Different Subject Matter, Constituting Abuse of Process....

The petitioners (decree holders) obtained a decree for possession and mesne profits in O.S. No. 3/1971 (later renumbered O.S. No. 79/2003) against the respondent (judgment debtor). The decree was conf...