High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviewed Writ Petition Against IPAB Order Cancelling Pharmaceutical Trademark Registration. The Court Examined Whether Rectification Application Was Maintainable Under Section 124 Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Whether IPAB Correctly Applied Deceptive Similarity Test to Cancel OFLOMAC Mark....

The dispute concerned pharmaceutical trademarks OFLOMAC and OFRAMAX. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, the petitioner, challenged an order of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) that allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MPSC Recruitment Process Cancellation. Court upholds MPSC's decision to cancel selection for Police Sub-Inspector posts due to irregularities in Physical Efficiency Test, finding no arbitrariness in the decision....

The petitioners, 24 candidates who had applied for the post of Police Sub-Inspector (Armed) in the Maharashtra Police, challenged the decision of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) to ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Without Proper Application of Mind. Transfer of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) to Wholly Owned Subsidiary Held Not Taxable as Income Under Section 2(24) Read With Section 45 of the Act....

The petitioner, Standard Industries Limited, is engaged in trading of textile goods and real estate development. It owned freehold land at Sewree, Mumbai, entitling it to Transferable Development Righ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation — Right to Expeditious Consideration Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated. The Court held that failure to decide the detenu's representation promptly renders the detention order illegal and directed release....

The petitioner, Sangharsh Alias Bhavya Nitin Adsul, challenged an order of detention dated 29th September 2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Non-Compliance with Time Limit and Approval Requirement under Income Tax Act, 1961. The order under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 for AY 2018-19 were invalid as they were passed after three years from the end of the assessment year without approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner....

The petitioner, Mrs. Chitra Supekar, a housewife, challenged the notice dated 20th March 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2018-19, and the subsequent o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Kotwals' Writ Petition Against Age Bar; Applies COVID-19 Relaxation GR to Group D Absorption. The Court Found That Government Resolution Dated 17.12.2021 Should Be Interpreted Liberally to Include All Kotwals Affected by Recruitment Delays, Ensuring No Anomalous Exclusion....

The petitioners, eleven Kotwals working on honorarium in Aurangabad district, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal that ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Section 482 Cr.P.C. Petition Against Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act — Statutory Appeal Under Section 374 Cr.P.C. Is the Proper Remedy. Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be used as an alternative remedy when a statutory appeal is available....

The petitioner, Vuppalapati Satish Kumar, was accused No.2 in C.C.No.22746/2017 before the XXVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. He was convicted for the offence punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Building Plan Sanction by Nagpur Improvement Trust Due to PIL Prohibitory Order. Court Directs NIT to Consider Application on Merits Without Reference to PIL Order, Holding That Prohibitory Order Does Not Create Absolute Bar....

The petitioners, Kartiki Jagdish Pawar and Sanjyoti Jagdish Pawar, purchased a plot in Nagpur from Dashrath Balaji Kalambe, who had originally bought it from Paradise Co-operative Housing Society in 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Mechanical Rejection of Stay Application for Non-Deposit of 20% Disputed Tax is Invalid; Directs Reconsideration. The court found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax failed to consider financial hardship of a 100% government-owned undertaking while rejecting stay under Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 147, 144, 156....

The litigation arose from income-tax assessment proceedings against the Goa Forest Development Corporation, a Government of Goa undertaking. The petitioner received a notice under Section 148 of the I...