High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366(A) and 344 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellants, Ramesh Irappa Mutyannatti and Channappa Irappa Jamboti, were convicted by the VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi, in S.C. No. 413/2011 for offences under Section 366...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Amputation of Both Legs Due to Fall from Train. Held that the claimant was a bona fide passenger and the incident was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling him to compensation....

The appellant, Nagesh Gulabrao Kale, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, for injuries sustained in an untoward incident on 15.04.2013. He alleged that while trav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Naresh Shamrao Yuvnate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and for causing disappearance of evidence under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The case pertains to the death of a married woman, Vandana, who was married to appellant No.1 Prem Rathod. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, Prem and his sister-in-law Chaya, murdered Vanda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit. Phonetic similarity between 'PLAXO' and 'PLASTO' held sufficient to grant injunction under Trade Marks Act, 1999....

The present appeal arises from an order dated 15/02/2018 passed by the learned District Judge-8, Nagpur, allowing an application for temporary injunction (Exhibit-5) in Trade Mark Suit No.02/2017. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Stall Licence Under APMC Act — Violation of Natural Justice. Joint Director's Order Set Aside for Lack of Notice and Hearing Before Cancellation of Licence Under Section 52B of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963....

The petitioner, Ravindra Arvind Bande, filed two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 14 January 2022 passed by the Joint Director (Marketing)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Family Court Appeal in Part, Sets Aside Decree of Divorce on Ground of Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Remands Maintenance Issue for Fresh Adjudication. The court held that the Family Court failed to properly appreciate evidence of cruelty and ought to have decided maintenance along with divorce....

The appellant (wife) filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, along with a claim for maintenance of Rs.80,000 per month for herself and her son. The Family...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Divorce Decree on Ground of Cruelty in Hindu Marriage Act Case. Husband's Appeal Dismissed as Court Finds Sufficient Evidence of Mental Cruelty and Failure to Return Streedhan....

The case involves an appeal by the husband against a Family Court decree dissolving his marriage on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and directing him to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions for Enhanced Compensation and Apportionment in Land Acquisition Matter. Petitioner, as legal heir, entitled to enhanced compensation under Sections 26-30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 24(1)(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013....

The petitioner, Faizal Ismail Sutar, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. In Writ Petition No.15511 of 2022, he sought a writ of mandam...