High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Commission Payment Disallowance Upheld. The court held that the Tribunal's finding that commission agents had not rendered services was based on valid material and sustainable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

The appellant, The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd., is a listed company engaged in manufacturing and sale of RCC pipes, steel pipes, etc. For the assessment year 1986-87, the appellant filed its return of i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parents' Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Falling from Crowded Train is Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Parents Held to be Dependants Entitled to Compensation Despite Lack of Documentary Proof....

The appellants, parents of the deceased Alpesh Arun Dhotre, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal after their son died while travelling in a local train on 26 January 2010....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC sustained as last seen evidence, motive, and recovery of weapon established guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The case pertains to the murder of Prithviraj @ Nannya Jayraj Sardar, aged 19, on 13 September 2011 between 10.15 to 10.30 am. The appellants, Mangesh Pandurang Bandagle (accused No.1) and Ganesh Avin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Sheet in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation. Allegations of Harassment and Threats Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC....

The petitioners, Suryakant Pandurang Holmukhe, Pralhad Sopan Rokade, and Pramila Pralhad Rokade, were accused in FIR No.49 of 2022 registered at Chinchani Wangi Police Station, Sangli, for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established Despite Acquittal of Some Accused....

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, Dist. Nanded, convicting the appellants for the murder of Santosh Ramesh Chavan. The pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and lacked corroboration....

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for the murder of Santu Jayram Ranmale and other offences. The prosecution case was that on 8 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Dowry Murder Case — Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Established by Prosecution. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murdering his wife by slitting her throat due to dowry demand....

The appellant, Nandu @ Santosh Thakre, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Vaishali. The marriage took place in 2007, and after two and a half years, harassment began due to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony was not corroborated and recovery of tainted money was not proved beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Babarao Shyamrao Vitalkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No.5/1996 for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Preventi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition by Real Estate Developer Against MCGM's Condition Requiring Heritage Committee NOC for Fort Redevelopment. Developer Challenges Condition 38 as Arbitrary and Discriminatory Under DCPR 2034 Regulation 52....

The case involved a writ petition by a proprietary real estate developer, Shreeji Realty, challenging a condition imposed by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (MCGM) in an Intimation of Disapprov...