High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in RERA Refund Dispute — Joint Developer Not Liable for Refund of Amounts Not Received. The court held that under Sections 12 and 18 of RERA, only a promoter who has received payment can be directed to refund, and joint and several liability cannot be imposed without statutory basis....

The case involves a dispute under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) regarding the refund of amounts paid by an allottee to a joint developer. The appellant, Wadhwa Group Ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. The plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform the contract and the suit being within limitation were concurrent findings of fact not open to challenge in second appeal....

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by the appellants (defendants) against the judgment and decree dated 27.10.2006 passed in R.A. No.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship and Death in Course of Employment Upheld. Compensation Award of Rs.8,90,480/- with 12% Interest Confirmed Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923....

The case involves an appeal by Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 03.03.2016 passed by the XXI Additional Small Cause Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in CRZ Area Due to Suppression of Facts and Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, not being owner of land, cannot challenge demolition; suppression of earlier proceedings disentitles relief....

The petitioner, Nandlal Khemka, filed multiple writ petitions challenging the demolition of structures on survey no. 46/1 at Candolim, Bardez, Goa. The petitioner claimed to be a social worker and env...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court....

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHADA tenants and contested their inclusion in the slu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment....

The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) granted initial permission ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Classification Dispute. Storage Charges for Hiring Tanks Held to Be 'Work' Under Section 194C, Not 'Rent' Under Section 194I of Income Tax Act, 1961....

The case involves two appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the classification of storage charges paid by the ass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute — Storage Charges for Hiring Tanks Constitute Rent Under Section 194I. Payment for use of storage tanks for imported edible oil is 'rent' under Section 194I of the Income Tax Act, 1961, requiring TDS at 20%, not 2% under Section 194C....

The case involves two appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to the assessee, M/s B. Arunkumar Trading Ltd. The ass...