High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord and New Tenant's Revision Petitions in Tenancy Dispute — Upholds Appellate Court's Declaration of Tenancy Rights of Legal Heir. The court held that the Small Causes Court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit by a tenant against a trespasser for possession under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999....

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the original defendant no.1 (landlord) and defendant no.2 (new tenant) against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Irregular Deposit of Rent Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Does Not Bar Eviction. Tenant's failure to deposit rent regularly despite court order justified decree for possession....

The case involves a dispute between the landlord (respondent) and the tenant (applicant) over eviction from a flat in Mumbai. The landlord filed a suit for eviction on the ground that the tenant was i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Additional Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to File Additional Written Statement on Payment of Costs of Rs. 10,000/-....

The petitioner, M/s. Rhea Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 08.04.2022 passed by the LXXXII Additional City Civil an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Judgment on Appeals Against Conviction in S.C.No.122/2015; Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Challenged by Accused....

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, considered three criminal appeals filed by convicted accused Nos. 1 to 3 against the judgment and order of conviction dated 12.07.2017 passed by the III ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 328, 394 r/w 34 IPC....

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai for offences under Sections 328, 302, and 394 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Aarti Chabalani on 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case — Upholds Conviction for Rape of Five-Year-Old Based on DNA Evidence. Semen on Victim's Clothes Matched Accused's DNA, Corroborating Victim's Account Despite Absence of Physical Injuries....

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of the accused for the rape of a five-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i)(j) IPC and Section 5(m) punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge Under Section 304 IPC. The court held that the blood alcohol level was within permissible limits under Section 185 MV Act and that custodial interrogation was not required....

The applicant, a female MBA graduate and businesswoman, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with a fatal hit-and-run accident. On 25.2.2024, she allegedly drove her Mercedes ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices for Illegal Constructions in Eco-Sensitive Zones. Court finds no merit in claims for regularisation of illegal structures in violation of planning laws....

The judgment addressed petitions challenging demolition notices issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) against illegal constructions in a green belt zone along the river Mutha. The petitioners...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Release of Contractual Payment Due to Disputed Facts. Court holds that disputed questions of fact regarding work completion and measurement cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, M/s. GVPR Engineers Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondents, officials of K...