High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract....

The appellant, Sri Bylamurthy, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid....

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th December 2012, and 5th May 2018, which prescribe the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Execution Court Order in Recovery of Possession Case — Petitioner's Application for Re-Delivery Dismissed as Not Maintainable Under Order XXI Rule 100 CPC. Court Held That Order XXI Rule 100 CPC Applies Only When Decree Holder Is Not Party to Proceedings, Not When Decree Holder Seeks Possession Against Judgment Debtor....

The petitioner, Smt. Girija Poojarthi, was the defendant No.7 in a suit for recovery of possession (O.S.No.374/1999) which was decreed on 24.07.2007. The decree holder, Smt. Kota Srilakshmi Urala, ini...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in HUF Partition Suit — Suit Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose on Alienation by Coparcener....

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by Defendant No.6, a third-party purchaser, challenging the rejection of his application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Earthquake Affected Person Certificate — Tahsildar Cannot Review Civil Court Decree. Circular Issued by Collector Cannot Override Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956....

The petitioner, originally the biological son of Shankar Ramu Pawar, was given in adoption to Lalu Shivram Jadhav and his wife on 18.04.2022 through a registered adoption deed. The adoption ceremony w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Orders Tax Authority to Refund Rs. 10.69 Crores to Petitioner. Court rules in favor of the Petitioner, mandates refund with interest due to improper adjustment of dues....

The case of a tax refund dispute, the Petitioner sought the refund of Rs. 10,69,89,606/- for the year 2011-2012. The Respondents had adjusted this refund against a tax demand for the year 2010-2011, d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of DV Proceedings to Family Court for Joint Trial with Divorce Petition Under Section 24 CPC. Husband's Application Granted to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Conflicting Decisions in Matrimonial Disputes....

The Bombay High Court allowed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the husband seeking transfer of DV proceedings initiated by the wife under the Protection o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where lower appellate court's finding that property is joint family property is based on evidence....

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Ranebennur, dated 06.11.2007 in R.A. No. 62/2003, which rev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings in Trade Mark Infringement Case — Allegation that FIR was Wrongly Registered Under Copyright Act to Bypass Procedures Under Trade Marks Act. Petitioner Contends Non-Compliance with Section 115(4) Proviso of Trade Marks Act, 1999 as Search and Seizure Conducted Without Opinion of Registrar....

The petitioner, proprietor of an oil mill trading in gram flour under the brand 'MRS Ganapathi', filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking to quash cr...