High Court of Karnataka Reserves Order on OCI Cardholder's Plea for Admission to Medical Courses Under Hyderabad-Karnataka Quota. Petition Challenged Citizenship Requirement in Admission Notification for Government Seats....
...
High Court
Sort by:
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Management's Challenge to CGIT Award Enhancing Retirement Age of Farm Workers from 55 to 60 Years. The Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's finding that the demand for parity in retirement age was legal and justified under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947....
The Central Silk Board Management filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the award dated 01.04.2013 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribu...
- 241
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Withdrawal of Writ Petition Seeking Renewal of Excise Licenses Due to Subsequent Rejection Order. Petitioner Granted Liberty to File Fresh Petition or Avail Remedies in Law....
The petitioner, Pushparaj Associates, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The ...
- 142
High Court
KAHC010400602018_1...
The appeals arose from the conviction of accused No.1, Smt. Uma, and accused No.2, Sri. Shivabasavegowda, by the trial court for offences under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian ...
- 60
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellant failed to prove that the suit property was joint family property and that the trial court and first appellate court had correctly appreciated the evidence....
The case pertains to a regular second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 24.07.2014 passed in R.A.No.179/2012 by the II Addition...
- 202
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Penetration Evidence — Medical Evidence Inconsistent with Allegation of Penetrative Sexual Assault. The court held that the evidence proved only an attempt to commit penetrative sexual assault under Section 18 read with Section 3 of POCSO Act, not the completed offence under Section 4....
The appellant, Mahadeo @ Mahadya Uttam Gonde, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 4 and 10 of the POCSO Act and Section 377 IPC, and sentenced to rigoro...
- 588
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Mill Worker's Petition Against Cancellation of Allotment Due to Non-Payment. Court Directs MHADA to Accept Payment and Hand Over Possession, Holding That Rejection of Extension Was Not Justified in Peculiar Facts....
The petitioner, Shamrav Dhondiba Kamble, a 76-year-old former mill worker, lost his job due to the 1982 mill strike and resided in his native village. Under Regulation 58 of the Development Control Re...
- 907
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of DV Act Proceedings to Family Court for Clubbing with Divorce Petition - Emphasizes Avoidance of Multiplicity and Conflict of Decisions. The court held that the wife's right to choose forum under the DV Act is not absolute and that transfer under Section 24 CPC is justified when common issues arise between matrimonial proceedings....
The applicant husband filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking transfer of a complaint filed by the respondent wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) pendi...
- 944
High Court
High Court Quashes Special Tribunal Order in Compensation Case — Upholds Civil Court Decree....
The case involved a dispute over compensation for Block No.241 under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. The appellants, legal heirs of a deceased individual, contested an ...
- 389
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Police Transfer Order as Not Violative of Section 22N Maharashtra Police Act. Section 22N creates a right to normal tenure but does not mandate transfer after completion of tenure....
The petitioner, Ankur Prabhakar Patil, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging an office order dated 23rd March 2021 issued by the Joint Commissioner of Polic...
- 1120
