Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Specific Performance Dispute Over Retrospective Operation of Madhya Bharat High Court of Judicature Act, 1949. Section 25 Read with Section 2(b) Confers Right of Special Appeal Against Divisional Bench Decree Passed Before Act Commencement in Proceedings Pending on Inclusion Date....

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a share in a business. The appellant filed the suit in the Indore High Court on November 6, 1947, against the respondents ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Jute Mill Company Against Railway Rates Tribunal Decision on Freight Rates. Section 28 of Indian Railways Act, 1890 Held Not Attracted Absent Competition and Undue Preference; Freight Reasonableness Assessed on Working Costs, Not Geographic Location or Commodity Prices....

In this civil appeal by special leave, the Supreme Court considered whether the Railway Rates Tribunal correctly dismissed a complaint by a jute mill company against railway administrations for allege...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal and Restores Conviction in Bribery Case — Raiding Party Testimony Not Per Se Unreliable, Independent Corroboration Not Invariable. Conviction Under Section 161 IPC Upheld Despite Absence of Neutral Eyewitnesses as Circumstantial Evidence and Officer Testimony Deemed Sufficient....

The State of Bihar filed a criminal appeal in the Supreme Court against the acquittal of Basawan Singh, a police sub-inspector, who had been convicted by a Special Judge under Section 161 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Defendant in Contract Extension Dispute: Agreement Vague and Uncertain, Suit Time-Barred. Extension of Time for Performance Under Section 63 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Requires Clear Agreement; Unilateral Extension Not Binding....

The case arose from a commercial dispute over non-delivery of cotton goods between a partnership firm and a textile mill. The appellants, partners of M/s. Navinchandra & Co., had placed two orders wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Decision of Authority Under Payment of Wages Act in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Classification. Bonus Awarded by Industrial Court Not 'Wages' Under Section 2(vi) as It Is Not Remuneration Payable Under Contract of Employment....

The Supreme Court of India considered whether a bonus awarded by the Industrial Court, Bombay, to the operatives of Tata Mills Ltd. constituted 'wages' within the meaning of Section 2(vi) of the Payme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Challenge to Statutory Authority's Jurisdiction Under Section 17 of Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955. Specified Authority Lacks Power to Adjudicate Disputed Claims as Section 17 Merely Provides Recovery Procedure for Amounts Already Determined by Competent Court or Authority....

The dispute arose when a working journalist, who had been supplying news to a daily newspaper owned by a private limited company on a fixed monthly honorarium, left India contrary to instructions and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Levy of Sales Tax on Inter-State Delivery Sales Under Sales Tax Laws Validation Act, 1956. Court Holds That Section 22 of Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, as Adapted, Imposed Tax on Explanation Sales, and the Validation Act Retrospectively Lifted Article 286(2) Ban, Making Levy Enforceable....

The dispute arose from writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution filed by dealers in yarn carrying on business in Madras who challenged the demand by the State of Andhra for sales tax on int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Clarifying Intent Requirement Under Section 300 Thirdly. The Court Holds That to Prove Murder Under Thirdly, It Suffices to Show That the Accused Intended the Particular Injury Inflicted and That Injury Was Sufficient to Cause Death....

The accused, Virsa Singh, thrust a spear into the abdomen of the deceased, causing a fatal wound. The doctor opined that the injury was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. The ...