Supreme Court Upholds Status of Society as 'State' under Article 12 Due to Government Control and Public Functions. The Uttar Pradesh Ganna Kishan Sansthan was found to be under deep and pervasive control of the State, fulfilling public functions previously managed by the government.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose regarding the status of the Uttar Pradesh Ganna Kishan Sansthan, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, and whether it qualifies as a 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The Sansthan was established by a government order on 4th August 1975 to take over functions previously performed by the Cane Development Department, specifically to provide training to cane-growers. The respondent, who was appointed as a Computer Officer, had his services terminated by the Sansthan, leading him to file a writ petition questioning the Sansthan's status as a 'State'. The High Court initially found that the Sansthan was not a 'State', but this view was later referred to a Full Bench, which concluded that the Sansthan was indeed a 'State' due to its public functions and the extent of government control over it. The Supreme Court upheld this finding, emphasizing that the Sansthan's functions were public in nature and that it was established under a government charter, with significant financial and administrative control exercised by the State. The court noted that the majority of the Governing Council members were government officials, and the Sansthan was not free to appoint non-government personnel to key positions. The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the High Court's decision that the Sansthan is a 'State' under Article 12.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Definition of State - Interpretation of Article 12 - Uttar Pradesh Ganna Kishan Sansthan deemed a 'State' - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 12 - The court held that the Sansthan, established to perform functions previously conducted by the government, is under deep and pervasive control of the State, thus qualifying as a 'State' under Article 12. (Paras 5-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Uttar Pradesh Ganna Kishan Sansthan is a 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Full Bench's decision that the Sansthan is a 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, with costs assessed at Rs. 50,000.

Law Points

  • Definition of State
  • Article 12
  • Societies Registration Act
  • public functions
  • governmental control
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (03) 53

Civil Appeal No. 1572 of 2009

2009-03-06

S.B. Sinha, Cyriac Joseph

State of U.P. & Anr.

Radhey Shyam Rai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of services and status of Sansthan

Remedy Sought

Reinstatement and declaration of Sansthan as 'State'

Filing Reason

Termination of services by the Sansthan

Previous Decisions

Initial finding by High Court that Sansthan was not a 'State'

Issues

Status of Sansthan as 'State' under Article 12 Extent of government control over Sansthan

Submissions/Arguments

The Sansthan performs public functions and is under government control The Sansthan is not a 'State' as it operates independently

Ratio Decidendi

The Sansthan was deemed a 'State' under Article 12 due to its public functions and the pervasive control exercised by the State over its operations.

Judgment Excerpts

The short question which arises for consideration herein is as to whether the Uttar Pradesh Ganna Kishan Sansthan... is a ‘State’ within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The functions which are being performed by the Sansthan were used to be performed by the Government directly. We, therefore, are of the opinion that the Full Bench of the High Court has rightly held the Sansthan a ‘State’ within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.

Procedural History

The respondent's services were terminated by the Sansthan, leading to a writ petition filed in the High Court, which was initially decided against the respondent. The matter was referred to a Full Bench, which reversed the earlier decision, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Societies Registration Act:
  • Constitution of India: Article 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Apprentice Teachers in Zilla Parishad Schools. Apprentice teachers appointed under the Apprentices Act, 1961 are not entitled to regularization or absorption as they are not employe...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court's Decision on Sales Tax Assessment. The court clarified that deposit of 20% of assessed tax is required even when no returns are filed.