Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Eviction Order Based on Advocate-Commissioner Report. High Court's conclusions unsupported by documents; Municipal Corporation granted liberty to proceed under law....

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a High Court order directing eviction of the appellants and removal of alleged encroachments. The High Court had relied on a report from Advocate-Commissio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Compensation Against Operating Surgeon in Medical Negligence Case. Low Platelet Count Surgery Held Unreasonable Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986....

The appellant, Nand Kishore Prasad, filed a consumer complaint after his 15-year-old son Sanjay Kumar died following surgery at Kurji Holy Family Hospital. The son was admitted on 10.11.1995 with abdo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Developer's Liability in Housing Scheme Dispute — Compensation Awarded for Unfair Trade Practices....

The case involved two appeals against a common order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning a housing scheme dispute. The original complainant, Smt. Gursharan Kaur, applied ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Remits Matter to High Court for Non-Joinder of Necessary Party in Service Dispute. The Court directed impleadment of the State Government as a necessary party in a service matter concerning arrears of salary for a stenographer....

The appellant, was appointed as a IIIrd grade clerk in 1963 and later confirmed as IInd grade clerk in 1969. He was appointed as a stenographer on an ad-hoc basis in 1969 but reverted to clerk in 1973...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Under Section 498A IPC for Lack of Evidence on Cruelty or Dowry Demand. High Court's finding of no mental cruelty for Section 306 IPC contradicted its own finding of dowry demand for Section 498A IPC without proper reasoning....

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Appellant against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi which had upheld his conviction under Section 498A IPC while acquitting him under Section 306 IPC. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Compassionate Appointment Case — Appointments Under 2006 Rules Valid. Executive Instructions Cannot Supersede Statutory Rules Governing Compassionate Appointments....

The case involves an appeal by the State of Bihar against a judgment of the Patna High Court which directed that the respondents, be granted compassionate appointment on a regular scale of pay in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Gold Smuggling — High Court's Quashing Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind Regarding Bail Likelihood. The Court held that the detaining authority must record satisfaction of imminent bail possibility, but service of documents within statutory period is valid....

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against the Bombay High Court's judgment dated 25.06.2019 quashing preventive detention orders passed under Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange &...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Remands Service Matter for Impleading State Government. Non-joinder of necessary party held curable by impleadment and remand, not dismissal....

The appellant, Radhey Shyam Pandey, was appointed as a IIIrd grade clerk in 1963 and later confirmed as IInd grade clerk in 1969. He was appointed as a stenographer on an ad-hoc basis in 1969 but was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Sets Aside Review Order Recalling Judgment Due to Non-Filing of Vakalatnama. Service of Notice Held Complete and Arguments Not Collusive, Hence Recall Unjustified Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC....

The dispute arose from a specific performance suit filed on 15.10.2010 by the appellant, against eight defendants. Only Respondent No.1 filed a written statement on 04.02.2011 but did not lead evidenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Third-Party Purchaser Seeking Impleadment in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaintiff Cannot Be Compelled to Implead Stranger Against Wish Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The Court held that a third party claiming independent title cannot be added in a suit for specific performance as it would enlarge the scope of the suit....

The appellant, purchased a suit property during the pendency of a suit for specific performance filed by the original plaintiffs (respondent nos. 2 & 3) against the original owner (respondent no. ...