Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Based on Income Tax Returns. Deceased's income fixed at Rs.1,98,192 per annum as per ITR, rejecting lower courts' assessment....

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Vivekananda Shenoy, aged 47, died in a collision with a bus on 30 September 2012. The claimant, his wife, sought compensation of Rs.1,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Claimants in Motor Accident Case, Enhances Compensation by Including Major Sons and Married Daughter as Dependents. The Court applied the Birender principle that legal representatives need not be fully dependent, and recalculated compensation under Section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Dev Raj, aged 50, died in a collision with a bus on 13 May 2015. The claimants, his wife, daughter, and two sons, filed a petition befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Amputation Victim in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability Assessed at 90% Based on Loss of Earning Capacity. Claimant's Age Determined as 22 Years Using Documentary Evidence, Multiplier of 18 Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the claimant-appellant, Sanjay Rajpoot, against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had enhanced the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Monthly Income Reassessed at Rs.10,000 Based on Oral Evidence. The Court held that oral testimony of the claimant can establish income in the absence of documentary proof, applying principles from Chandra v. Mukesh Kumar Yadav and other precedents....

The appellant, Nur Ahamad Abdulsab Kanavi, a 27-year-old Goundy, was injured in a motor vehicle accident on 24 June 2014 when a goods vehicle driven rashly and negligently collided with his motorcycle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abduction Case Under Section 366-A IPC Due to Lack of Proof of Minority and Absence of Allegation of Illicit Intercourse. Inconsistent Testimony of Victim and Failure to Establish Ingredients of Offence Lead to Acquittal....

The appeal arose from the order of the Revisional Court confirming the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for allegedly abducting a minor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Witness Silence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 109 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Siba Nial @ Trilochan, setting aside his conviction under Sections 302 and 109 IPC for the murder of Dhaneswar Kata and Nirupama Kata. The case arose from an in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Canara Bank's Appeal in Compassionate Appointment Case — Sets Aside Compensation and Costs, Directs Reconsideration of Age Relaxation. The Court held that the High Court erred in substituting its own view on financial distress and in awarding compensation and costs without finding mala fides....

The case involves an appeal by Canara Bank against a judgment of the Kerala High Court that directed the bank to appoint the respondent, Ajithkumar G.K., on compassionate grounds and awarded compensat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in U.P. Gangsters Act Case — Quashes FIR for Lack of Anti-Social Activity. Property Disputes of Civil Nature Cannot Be Basis for Prosecution Under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986....

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Jay Kishan and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, challenging the dismissal of their writ petition by the Allahabad High Court. The Hig...