Judgements without assigned author

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim for Share Trading Losses. Claimant Failed to Prove Respondent's Negligence or Breach of Contract, and Findings of Fact by Arbitrator Are Binding....

The appellant, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 11th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Excise License Renewal Case — State Cannot Deny Renewal Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Renewal of FL-3 license under Maharashtra Foreign Liquor Rules cannot be refused on grounds of pending criminal proceedings without affording opportunity of hearing....

The petitioner, John Distilleries Private Limited (formerly John Distilleries Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, with its manufacturing unit at Chitali, Ahmednagar, and regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Revenue Orders in Land Mutation Dispute Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner's challenge to mutation entry and revenue orders dismissed as second round of litigation without exhausting statutory appeal under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code....

The petitioner, IVRCL Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 30th June 2015 passed by the Sub-Divisional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Bombay Public Trust Act Case — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Trust Registration. The court held that the appellant failed to prove that the trust was a private trust and not a public trust, and that the Charity Commissioner's order directing registration under the Bombay Public Trust Act was valid....

The appellant, Mallari S/o Ramchandra Nimbalkar, filed an appeal under Section 72(4) of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 (BPT Act) challenging the order dated 08.11.2005 passed by the II Additional D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation for death of breadwinner under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case involves two appeals: MFA No.233/2021 filed by the claimants (legal representatives of the deceased S.B. Yeshwant) seeking enhancement of compensation, and MFA No.5244/2020 filed by the Insur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation for death of breadwinner under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, with future prospects and multiplier applied correctly....

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of S.B. Yeshwant, who died in a road accident on 19.08.2018. The claimants, including his wife, children, and mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Industrial Investment Corporation Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Ground of Appeal Cannot Be Ground for Review Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC....

The present Review Application was instituted by The Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited and its Branch Manager seeking review of the order dated 20.06.2022 passed in W.P.No.28096 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Industrial Investment Dispute — Grounds for Appeal Cannot Be Grounds for Review. Review of order dated 20.06.2022 in W.P.No.28096 of 2014 dismissed as no error apparent on face of record....

The present Review Application was filed by the Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd and its Branch Manager seeking review of an order dated 20.06.2022 passed in W.P.No.28096 of 2014. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Application in Revenue Matter — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC cannot be expanded to re-adjudicate merits; applicant failed to establish error apparent on face of record....

The present Review Application was filed by M.Ramasubramaniam seeking review of an order dated 21.07.2022 passed in W.P.No.18594 of 2022 by the Madras High Court. In the original writ petition, the Co...