Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Complaint Dismissed for Default in Section 138 NI Act Case — Magistrate's Order Without Notice to Complainant Held Illegal. The Court held that dismissal of a complaint for default without notice to the complainant is illegal and restored the complaint under inherent powers.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 62
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Agasti Sarv Seva Sangh, filed a criminal complaint against the respondent, Kailas Rathod, alleging offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The Magistrate ordered process only under Section 138 of the NI Act. The complaint remained pending for about five years as the respondent's presence could not be secured despite summons and warrants. On 31.08.2013, the Magistrate dismissed the complaint for default, noting that the complainant had failed to secure the accused's presence despite ample opportunity. The order was titled 'Special Drive Dated 31.08.2013'. The applicant then filed a criminal revision application before the High Court. The High Court observed that the Magistrate's order was passed without issuing any notice to the complainant, which is illegal and contrary to the principles of natural justice. The Court held that the dismissal for default without notice is not sustainable. The Court allowed the revision application, set aside the Magistrate's order, and restored the complaint to its original number. The Court directed the Magistrate to proceed with the complaint in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Dismissal of Complaint for Default - Section 482 CrPC - Restoration - The Magistrate dismissed the complaint for default without issuing notice to the complainant, which is illegal and contrary to principles of natural justice - The High Court, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, can restore the complaint when the dismissal is without jurisdiction or illegal - Held that the order of dismissal is set aside and the complaint is restored to its original number (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dismissal of a complaint for default by the Magistrate without issuing notice to the complainant is legal and whether the High Court can restore the complaint under Section 482 CrPC

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The revision application is allowed. The order dated 31.08.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Akole, dismissing the complaint for default is set aside. The complaint is restored to its original number. The Magistrate is directed to proceed with the complaint in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Dismissal of complaint for default without notice to complainant is illegal
  • Magistrate must issue notice before dismissing for default
  • Restoration application under Section 482 CrPC maintainable when no alternative remedy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (01) 2

Criminal Revision Application No. 16 of 2014

2014-01-28

Abhay M. Thipsay

Mr. S.T. Shelke for applicant, Mr. G.O. Wattamwar h/f Mr. S.G. Rudrawar for respondent

Agasti Sarv Seva Sangh

Kailas S/o Rohidas Rathod

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision application against dismissal of complaint for default

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the complaint dismissed for default

Filing Reason

The Magistrate dismissed the complaint for default without issuing notice to the complainant

Previous Decisions

The Magistrate dismissed the complaint for default on 31.08.2013

Issues

Whether the dismissal of a complaint for default without notice to the complainant is legal Whether the High Court can restore the complaint under Section 482 CrPC

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the Magistrate dismissed the complaint without issuing any notice, which is illegal and against principles of natural justice

Ratio Decidendi

Dismissal of a complaint for default without notice to the complainant is illegal and contrary to principles of natural justice. The High Court, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, can restore the complaint when the dismissal is without jurisdiction or illegal.

Judgment Excerpts

The order passed by the learned Magistrate dismissing the complaint in default, without issuing any notice to the complainant, is illegal and cannot be sustained. The inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be invoked to set aside such an order and restore the complaint.

Procedural History

The applicant filed a criminal complaint against the respondent under Section 138 of the NI Act and Section 420 IPC. The Magistrate ordered process only under Section 138 NI Act. The complaint remained pending for about five years as the respondent's presence could not be secured. On 31.08.2013, the Magistrate dismissed the complaint for default. The applicant then filed the present criminal revision application before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 420
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Complaint Dismissed for Default in Section 138 NI Act Case — Magistrate's Order Without Notice to Complainant Held Illegal. The Court held that dismissal of a complaint for default without notice to the compl...
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Builder's Appeals in Execution Proceedings for Refund with Interest. State Commission's Calculation of Decretal Amount Upheld Under Section 73 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.