Search Results for "xerox copy"

221 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Agreement Not a Bar to Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Payment under agreement does not extinguish right to seek higher compensation if agreement was not voluntary or was under coercion.

The appellant, Syed Miya s/o Syed Buran, filed two appeals challenging the judgment and award dated 20.8.1993 passed by the Reference Court, which rej...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Doctor in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dr. Smt. Usha Dhondiram Sarwade, a Casualty Medical Officer at Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, was convicted by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Application to Mark Xerox Copy of Cheque as Exhibit in NI Act Case. Court holds that secondary evidence of a cheque is admissible under Section 146 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the trial court erred in refusing to mark the xerox copy as an exhibit.

The applicant, Shobhasingh Premsingh Sandhu, filed a criminal application in the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad against the State of Maharashtra a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case — Failure to Prove Theft Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal upheld as prosecution failed to establish illegal connection and theft of electricity under Section 135(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.07...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case — Failure to Prove Theft Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused Acquitted Under Section 135(1) of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 as Prosecution Failed to Establish Illegal Connection and Theft of Electricity.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Judgment in Security Deposit Recovery Suit — Triable Issues Raised on Forfeiture Clause and Interest Claim. Leave and Licence Agreement's Clause 14(c) Permitting Forfeiture of Deposit for Overstay Creates Triable Issue, Precluding Summary Judgment Under Order 37 CPC.

The plaintiff, RMC Readymix (I) P.ltd, filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Kanayo Khubcha...