Search Results for "wooden stump"

7 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Vishwas @ Guddu Rajesh Dahiwale, Kamlesh @ Kamya Kalidas Patil, and Suraj Raju Manwatkar, were convicted by the trial court for the mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Ashok Kamble on 1/11/2011. The prosecution alleged that the three appellants, along with a juvenile, attacked the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 326 IPC for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapon. Appellate Court's Reversal of Acquittal Based on Proper Reappreciation of Evidence and Medical Testimony is Maintainable.

The case pertains to a criminal revision filed by Yogesh Gajanan Sayankar and Dhanraj Shalikrao Sayankar against the judgment of the Additional Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Inconsistency with Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was mother of deceased and her testimony was not corroborated.

The case involves two appeals against the conviction of the appellants under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for the murder of Mushtaq Samsher Ali. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Vitthal Tukaram Kadam and his son Somnath Vitthal Kadam, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, for the murder of Lal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 325 IPC for Causing Grievous Hurt with Wooden Stump in Family Dispute. Appellant's Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone Considering Long Pendency of Appeal and No Criminal Antecedents.

The appellant, Shivaji s/o Guja Pawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Sessions Trial No. 137 of 1994 for the offence puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Laxman Baban Waghe and Ramu @ Ramdas Budhya Waghe, original accused Nos. 3 and 4, were convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, ...