Search Results for "witness restriction"

681 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 681 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Externee in Bombay Police Act Case — Acquittals Ignored, Natural Justice Violated. Externment Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Consider Material Evidence and Restricted Witnesses, Violating Fair Play Principles.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, heard a criminal writ petition filed by Aleem Khan Salim Khan challenging an externment order dated 8 March 2011 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Prosecution to Refresh Witness Memory Using Section 161 CrPC Statement During Examination-in-Chief. Use of Section 161 Statement for Refreshing Memory Violates Section 162 CrPC and Section 159 Evidence Act.

The petitioner, Meena Tuyekar, the accused in a corruption case, challenged an order dated 18.1.2024 passed by the trial court allowing the Public Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Trial Court's Order Permitting Re-examination of Complainant's Witness in NI Act Case. Court holds that once a witness is discharged, recalling for further examination is impermissible without justifiable cause under Section 311 CrPC.

The applicant, Anil s/o Govindrao Chaudhari, challenged two orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur dated 14/9/2012 and 15/01/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Order Refusing to Summon Defence Witnesses in MCOC Case. Issue Pertains to Relevance of Confessions of Other Accused Persons Recorded Under Section 18 of MCOC Act in a Separate Trial.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Wakf Property Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Section 6 of Wakf Act, 1954. One-Year Limitation Period for Challenging Wakf Publication Cannot Be Extended by Notice Requirement Under Section 56.

The appellant, Syed Zainul Abedeen, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Wakf Act, 1954, seeking a declaration that the property Mandarja Madnumber 14 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Frames Preliminary Issue of Limitation in Partition Suit Over Property Bequeathed by Will. Plaintiffs Claim Share in Villa Bemvinda and Challenge Development Agreement After Probate Was Granted and Revocation Petition Dismissed.

The dispute arose over Villa Bemvinda, a property in Bandra, Mumbai, originally owned by Andrew D'Cunha. He executed a will on 20.2.1971 bequeathing t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Rationing Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness testimony insufficient.

The appellant, Pandharinath Shelke, was a Rationing Officer at the Rationing Office, Kurla. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay in S...