Search Results for "winding-up petition"

26 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Resolution Professional to Continue CIRP Under IBC Despite Pending Winding-Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956. Leave under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 granted to proceed with Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The judgment concerns Company Application No. 10 of 2017 filed by the Resolution Professional of Murli Industries Limited (the corporate debtor) under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Recall of Winding-Up Order in Company Law Dispute. Ex-Director Lacked Locus Standi and Application Was Barred by Delay and Laches Under Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order dated 22/02/2017 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which allowed Company Application No.448 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Permits Official Liquidator to File Criminal Complaint Under Section 454 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Ex-Directors for Non-Filing of Statement of Affairs. Court Directs Ex-Directors to Deposit Rs. 11,30,743/- as Estimated Cost of Investigation.

The Bombay High Court considered an Official Liquidator's Report (OLR No. 5 of 2013) in the winding up of Phoenix Alchemy Pvt. Ltd. The company was or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Videocon Industries Against Winding Up Order for Non-Payment of Guarantee Debt to Italian Bank. Patronage Letter Held to Be a Guarantee Under Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Claim Not Time-Barred.

The case involves an appeal by Videocon Industries Limited against an order of the Company Judge directing payment of Rs.259.73 crores to Intesa Sanpa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Against Listed Company in Reverse Factoring Dispute. Debt disputed in bona fide manner and company is solvent, hence winding up not justified under Sections 433(e) and (f) of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, SBI Global Factors Ltd., a financial institution, filed a winding up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434(1)(...