Search Results for "wilful suppression"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "wilful suppression"

54 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in CRPF Constable Dismissal Case, Upholding Termination for Concealment of Criminal Case. Termination was justified under Rule 5(1) of Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, as appellant suppressed pending criminal case in verification form, despite subsequent acquittal, in a disciplined paramilitary force.

26 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from the termination of a Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) for concealing information about a pending criminal c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Award Reinstating Employee with Back Wages in Service Dispute for Non-Disclosure of Pending Criminal Case. Employee's Failure to Disclose Pending Prosecution Under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 in Attestation Form Held Not to Vitiate Appointment as Employer Failed to Prove Suppression Was Wilful or That Employee Was Convicted.

29 Nov 2019

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an industrial dispute between an employee, Narendra Vitthalrao Tarsekar, and his employer, State Ban...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

7 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Show Cause Notice Issued After Six Years Held Time-Barred as Assessee Did Not Suppress Facts.

22 Jun 2011

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, Excise a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

10 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice and Retrospective Amendment to Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 — Upholds Validity of Officers' Powers and Amendment.

3 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Sunil Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a show caus...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Confirms CESTAT's Finding That Transaction Value of Imported Goods Is Acceptable Under Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962. Burden of Proof on Revenue to Show Fraud or Misdeclaration Not Discharged.

29 Apr 2026

The case involves four Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Port-Export), Chennai, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, ...

Supreme Court

Court Restores Original Decision, Declares Contempt Petition Time-Barred. High Court Review Overstepped Jurisdiction; Importance of Adhering to Limitation Periods in Contempt Proceedings Emphasized

22 Jul 2024

The judgment addresses a contempt petition regarding the failure of a Tahsildar to effect a mutation ordered by a Single Judge. The Division Bench (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

1 Sep 2020

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)