Search Results for "vehicle involvement disputed"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Minor Deceased. Compensation of Rs. 4,50,000 Upheld as Vehicle Involvement and Negligence Proved Despite Delay in FIR.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a minor deceased, Mehulbhai Thakorbhai Patel, who died due to injuries sustained i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Case — Insurer Liable Despite Alleged Breach of Policy Conditions. Owner Not Guilty of Willful Violation as Vehicle Was Driven by Authorized Driver with Valid License at Time of Accident.

The appellant, S.N. Kenchanna, owner of a bus bearing registration No.KA-06-B-9069, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence Established by Involvement of Vehicle. Claimants Awarded Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Death of Deceased in Road Accident.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, who are the widow, minor son, and mother of the deceased Prakash Deorao Patil, against the judgment and order d...