Search Results for "upgraded post"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Personal Secretaries for Pay Refixation by Merging Special Pay into Basic Pay. The court held that special pay granted for higher responsibilities must be merged upon promotion to a higher post, quashing the state's order denying the benefit.

The petitioners, an association of Personal Assistants, Private Secretaries, and Senior Private Secretaries of the Bombay High Court, along with an in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Pay Fixation Dispute Under CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. Rule 11 Applies When Employee Opts for Revised Pay from Date of ACP Upgradation, Not Rule 7.

The case involves a dispute over the correct rule for pay fixation under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. The respondent, Raj Kum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Pension Refixation Based on Post-Retirement Upgradation of Post. Pension of retired government servant cannot be revised on basis of upgraded pay scale of post after retirement.

The petitioner, Dr. J.A. Patil, retired as Director of Seeds Certification in the State of Maharashtra on 30th June 1980, holding a Class I post with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Tender Cancellation Case — Public Interest Justifies Cancellation of LoI Despite Prior Acceptance. Non-Arbitrariness in State Action Not Established When Cancellation is Based on Legitimate Concerns Over Technical Compliance and Financial Viability.

The dispute arose from a tender issued by the State of Himachal Pradesh for the supply, installation, and maintenance of electronic Point-of-Sale (ePO...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Retrospective Salary Revision Under Government Resolution. Government Resolution dated 15.05.2000 held prospective, not retrospective, and claim barred by delay and laches.

The petitioner, Mrs. Vinaya L. Pai, filed a writ petition in October 1991 before the Bombay High Court. She was initially appointed as a part-time dem...