Search Results for "unfair conduct"

1052 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1052 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices — Increments and Leave Benefits for Daily Wagers Upheld Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged a judgment and order dated 17th October 2019 passed by the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Coercion. Employees' Allegations of Forced Resignation and Acceptance of Cheques Not Proven; Industrial Court's Finding of Voluntary Settlement Upheld.

The petitioners, employees of Hotel King's Palace, filed a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Interim Relief Against Dismissal in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court and Industrial Court Correctly Refused to Restrain Employer from Issuing Punishment Order at Second Show Cause Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Dhanraj Gaikwad, was employed as a clerk with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 2008. He was charge-sheet...