Search Results for "unexplained investments"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Shareholder Dispute Over Share Transfer Agreement — Agreement dated 14th June 2019 Held Valid and Enforceable.

The dispute arises out of a Share Purchase Agreement dated 14th June 2019 between the Kamdar Group (appellants) and the Sanghvi Group (respondents) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 for Unexplained Share Capital. Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investor Companies Despite Receiving Share Premium at Rs. 190 per Share.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Block Assessment Case — Unexplained Investments Not Proven as Income. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to establish that the cash credits and investments belonged to the assessee, and the ITAT correctly deleted the additions.

The case involves appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Investigation into MLA's Assets for Lack of Credible Material. Court holds that mere allegations of disproportionate assets without prima facie evidence cannot justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Sanjay Dinanath Tiwari, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking investigation into the financial affairs o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Properties under SAFEMA. Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Validly Triggers SAFEMA Proceedings Despite Non-Execution of Detention and Redemption of Confiscated Currency.

The petitioner, Smt. Yamini S. Bhagwanji, challenged the forfeiture of three immovable properties and certain bank accounts under the Smugglers and Fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — HDPE Powder Stock Not Unexplained Investment Under Section 69. Assessee's books of accounts showing purchases and closing stock were accepted, and nature and source of investment were duly explained.

The appeal was filed by the assessee, Babulal C. Borana, a dealer in HDPE plastic powder, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the d...