High Court Dismisses Retired Medical Officer's Petition against Recovery of Excess Pay under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Recovery Upheld Because Officer Had Given Undertaking and Was Not a Class-III or IV Employee. The Court held that the protections against recovery from retired employees under State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih do not apply when the employee has given an undertaking to refund excess payments, and Rule 134A of the Pension Rules expressly permits such recovery.
10 Mar 2017The petitioner, Dr. Ravindra Shamrao Darunte, retired as a Medical Officer on 31 July 2015. The Accountant General (A&E), respondent No. 3, acting on ...
