Search Results for "unconscionable transaction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "unconscionable transaction"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Share Valuation, Awards Interest at 6% Pre-Decree and 9% Post-Decree in Decades-Old Dispute. Balancing Equity and Commercial Realities: SC Modifies Interest Rates in Rajasthan State Mines Share Acquisition Case

1 Apr 2025

Valuation of Shares – The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court’s valuation of shares at ₹640 per share, rejecting the State’s objections. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Captive Power Producers in Hydel Policy Dispute Over Water Royalty Charges. The court held that the agreements incorporating the government policy did not impose water royalty liability on captive power producers, distinguishing them from independent power producers under the policy framework.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by M/s. Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSIL) and Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) against a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sub-Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Appellate Bench Decision of Bombay Stock Exchange. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitral tribunal and appellate bench are not liable to be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

9 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Actal, a sole proprietorship concern engaged in trading in shares, insurance, bonds, mutual funds, etc., was associated with the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Flat Purchase Dispute — Earnest Money Refund with Daily Fine and Compound Interest Upheld but Reduced. Clause 4 of Agreement for Construction and Sale Held to Be a Valid Forfeiture Clause, Not a Penalty, Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

9 Mar 2005

The plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish J.N. Counte, entered into a written agreement dated 13.4.96 with the defendant, M/s. Carl Estate Private Limited, for the p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Benami Transaction Not Proved. Suit for declaration and possession decreed as plaintiff established title through sale deed and possession, while defendant failed to prove that property was purchased benami in plaintiff's name.

31 Mar 2023

The appellant-defendant Mahadev filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the concurrent judgment...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Agreement of Sale Found Unconscionable and Not Proved. Court holds that readiness and willingness is sine qua non for decree of specific performance and that appellate court cannot rely on unproduced documents without following Order 41 Rule 27 CPC.

27 Jan 2011

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 8-8-1973 filed by the original plaintiff (respondent No.1) against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Trust and Accounts Against Bank in Palm Oil Import Dispute. Consent Decree in Prior Suit Bars Plaintiff from Claiming Sale Proceeds as Trust Property.

12 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, Bajranglal Anilkumar Jaju and Hitesh Anilkumar Jaju, filed Suit No. 824 of 1980 against The Vyasya Bank Ltd. seeking a declaration tha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Direction in Public Interest Litigation on Cinema Hall Food Prohibition. The High Court's order directing cinema hall owners not to prohibit carrying outside food was challenged as exceeding jurisdiction under Article 226, with the Supreme Court considering the right to choice of food under Article 21 and the Jammu and Kashmir Cinemas (Regulation) Rules 1975.

3 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India considered appeals against a judgment dated 18 July 2018 by a Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. The ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Investment in Business Partnership Attracts Section 138 NI Act Liability Despite Dispute Over Debt Legality.

10 Sep 2012

The appellant, Sheikh Shabbir, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vasco-da-Gama, acquitting the res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Single Conviction for Multiple Cheque Dishonours — Default Sentences Ordered Consecutively. Each cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is a distinct offence, and default sentences under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 can run consecutively.

5 May 2026

The petitioner, Cyrus Noshirwan Kartak, was a director of Mintaur Engineering Private Ltd. The respondent-complainant sold and delivered goods to the ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)