Search Results for "uncommunicated adverse remarks"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge Due to Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks. Adverse CR Entries Without Communication Violate Principles of Natural Justice Under Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008.

The petitioner, a judicial officer, challenged an order dated 26 February 2010 passed by the Principal Secretary and Legal Advisor, Law and Justice De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promotion Challenge in Port Trust Service Matter — Adverse Remarks Must Be Communicated Before Being Considered for Promotion. Uncommunicated adverse remarks cannot be used to deny promotion to Assistant Traffic Manager under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Manuel Lourenco D'Costa, was an employee of the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mormugao (respondent No.1). He was appointed as a Cle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher Terminated Without Prior Approval. Termination of Assistant Teacher Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of MEPS Act is Void, and Reinstatement with Backwages is Proper.

The petitioners, Anjuman-E-Taleem and another, are the management of Haji Mukadam High School, Khed. They appointed respondent No.2 as an Assistant Te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IAS Officer's Challenge to Compulsory Retirement in Public Interest. Service Record Including Adverse Entries and Minor Punishment Justified Action Under Rule 16(3) of All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958.

The petitioner, Paramjeet Singh Bhogal, an IAS officer of the 1967 batch allotted to Maharashtra Cadre, challenged the order of compulsory retirement ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Municipal Employee Before Age 58 — Violation of Service Regulations. Compulsory retirement at age 55 without following Regulation 25(3) of BMC Service Regulations, 1989 set aside as arbitrary and illegal.

The Petitioner, Smt. Yashoda Bapu Jadhav, was an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC). She was compulsorily retired at the ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Premature Retirement of Deputy Director of Health Services. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and found the premature retirement order valid based on adverse entries and public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Mrs. Pratibha Gulhane, a retired Deputy Director of Health Services, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Petition Challenging Adverse Remarks in Annual Confidential Reports Due to Delayed Communication - Delayed communication of ACRs violates natural justice, making adverse remarks inadmissible for promotion consideration under Government Resolution dated 31 March 1989.

The dispute involved a petition filed by a retired Office Superintendent against the State of Gujarat and another respondent, challenging adverse rema...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Supersession of Senior Teacher for Headmistress Post. Appointment of Junior Teacher Based on Interview Without Following Seniority-Cum-Merit Under MEPS Act and Rules Held Invalid.

The petitioner, Mahila Samiti Trust, runs an educational institution. Respondent No.1, Smt. Kiran Sham Shivnani, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher...