Search Results for "unauthorized debit"

41 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cyber Fraud Case — Directs Bank to Refund Rs. 76.9 Lakhs Under RBI Circular. Unauthorized Addition of Beneficiaries and Absence of OTP Constitute Deficiency in Service Under RBI Circular Dated 6 July 2017.

The petitioners, a director and a closely held family company, maintained a bank account with Respondent No. 2 for 15-20 years. On 1 October 2022, unk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Conspiracy, Cheating, Forgery, and Corruption in Fake Balance Certificate Scam. Trial Court Convicted Bank Manager and Proprietors for Creating Fraudulent Credit Entries and Balance Certificates to Facilitate Loan of Rs.36 Crores.

The present criminal appeals arose from a common judgment of conviction and sentence rendered by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bengaluru, in Spl.C....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.

The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...