Search Results for "tripartite agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "tripartite agreement"

125 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Construction in Powai and Tirandaz — No Breach of Tripartite Agreement or ULC Act Exemption Found. The court held that the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans and permissions, and the challenge to the exemption order was barred by delay and laches.

22 Feb 2012

The judgment concerns three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kamlakar Motiram Satve, Rajendra Thacker, and Medha Patkar challenging the con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Land Development Dispute, Restoring Tribunal's Findings on Breach and Damages. The Court Clarifies Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Holding that High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Re-evaluating Factual Determinations.

21 Apr 2025

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 30th April 2015, which was rendered in appeals under Section 37 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Licence Agreement Contained Valid Arbitration Clause for Disputes Arising from Termination and Recovery of Possession. The Court held that the arbitration clause survived termination and that the Commercial Court erred in refusing reference under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing First Appeals filed by the appellant against order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

20 Mar 2025

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Dec 2021

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 8 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Over Development Agreements — Arbitration Clause Binding on Non-Signatory Transferee. The court held that a non-signatory who claims through or under a signatory to an arbitration agreement is bound by the arbitration clause, and appointed a retired judge as sole arbitrator.

30 Sep 2014

The judgment concerns two related matters: a Notice of Motion (No. 540 of 2013) in Suit No. 62 of 2013 and an Arbitration Application (No. 86 of 2013)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Farmers' Insurance Claim in Cold Storage Fire — Insurer Liable Despite No Privity of Contract. Farmers are Consumers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and Insurance Company Must Pay for Loss of Stored Agricultural Produce.

31 Jan 2020

The case involves multiple appeals arising from a common order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission regarding a fire that occurred o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Receiver and Directions for Possession in Redevelopment Dispute — Non-Consenting Members Directed to Vacate to Facilitate Redevelopment. Court held that overwhelming majority of society members having consented, non-consenting members cannot obstruct redevelopment and must hand over possession through Court Receiver.

3 Oct 2013

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 16 September 2013 in a motion taken out by the first respondent (developer) in a s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Housing Board's Appeal in Consumer Dispute — Liability for Mental Harassment and Litigation Costs Apportioned 70:30 Between Developer and Housing Board; Interest Rate Reduced to 9% p.a. The Court held that Clause 9(c) of the Tripartite Agreement does not cover mental harassment or litigation costs, and the interest rate should remain at 9% p.a. as per the agreement and earlier orders.

17 Dec 2019

The appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by Respondent No. 2 (a flat buyer) against M/s. Parasvanath Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Developer) and Cha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)