Search Results for "trip"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "trip"

187 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 187 result(s)

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

21 Dec 2023

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by NWKRTC in Motor Accident Claims, Upholds Tribunal Awards with Enhanced Compensation. Contributory Negligence of Bus Driver Established, Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation with Right to Recover from Owner.

5 Dec 2023

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the North-West Karnataka Transport Corporation (NWKRTC) against the awards of the Motor Accidents Clai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Patent Infringement Suit — Appellant's Product Falls Within Scope of Respondent's Patent Claims. Court finds that the appellant's product, a fire protection system for electrical transformers, infringes the respondent's patent IN 202302, and the challenge to the patent's validity is not prima facie tenable.

25 Apr 2023

The respondent, CTR Manufacturing Industries Private Limited, filed a suit for patent infringement against the appellant, M/s. Tri-Parulex Fire Protec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Uber's Appeal Against CCI Investigation Order for Alleged Abuse of Dominant Position Through Predatory Pricing. The Court held that information showing Uber incurred a loss of Rs.204 per trip was sufficient to form a prima facie case under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

3 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against MakeMyTrip Officials in Trademark Infringement Case — Domain Name Dispute Lacks Criminal Intent. Court holds that mere registration of similar domain names without evidence of dishonest intention does not constitute criminal offence under Sections 63, 103, 104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

16 Aug 2019

The case involves three criminal applications filed by Rajesh Dalal (Vice President), Make My Trip India Pvt. Ltd., and Deep Kalra (CEO) seeking quash...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds KSTAT Order Setting Aside Stage Carriage Permits in Inter-State Route Dispute Citing Bangalore Scheme and Lack of Counter-Signature. The Court Clarified that a Round Trip is Not an Enclave Route Under Section 88 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

11 Jun 2019

The dispute arose from the grant of stage carriage permits by the Karnataka State Transport Authority (KSTA) on the route Tumkur to I.D. Halli, which ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Transport Appellate Tribunal Order in Motor Vehicles Act Case — Lack of Jurisdiction to Review Own Orders. The Tribunal cannot review its own orders under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as no power of review is conferred by the Act or Rules.

5 Apr 2017

The petitioners, who are private bus operators, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's finding of breach of contract and award of damages upheld as not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Union of India, through the General Manager of Western Railway, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deduction Under Section 80V for Interest on Borrowings for Tax Payment and Directs Recomputation of Disallowance Under Rule 6D on Aggregate Trip Basis. The Court held that Section 80V deduction is available if borrowings were for tax payment, and Rule 6D disallowance must be computed on aggregate trips per employee.

1 Aug 2014

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 1985-86. The assessee, M/s Mafa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules on Disallowance Under Rule 6D and Allowability of Spouse's Foreign Travel Expenses. Disallowance under Rule 6D of Income-tax Rules, 1962 must be computed on annual per employee basis, not per trip; expenditure on wife's foreign trip allowable if wholly and exclusively for business.

15 Jul 2005

The case is an income tax reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Income-tax, B...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)